Hi!
We are offering you a possibility to use your free time and make some money over the
internet.
This is a global business with warranty.
As this is a serious business we expect from our candidates the following:
- minimum 18 years of age
- desire for team work
If you are
Hi, something happened when I tried to run texteroids.
An X window was open, and when I ran texteroids a black box
appeared briefly before disappearing. These are the messages I got:
%% DPS Client Library Warning:
Auto-launching DPS NX agent.
%% DPS Client Library Warning:
FAILED to
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Hrafnkell Eiríksson wrote:
Hi
I can't get the -xkbmap parameter to work. I want to use it to
set the keyboard layout to Icelandic. Issuing setxkbmap is from
a shell after I log in works (though I have to issue it twice for
some reason). I though that adding -xkbmap is
Aman News Center in Arabic
http://www.amanjordan.org/arabic_news/
Aman News Center in English
http://www.amanjordan.org/english/daily_news/index.php
Aman Main Page in Arabic
http://www.amanjordan.org/index1.htm
Aman Main Page in English
http://www.amanjordan.org/english/index.htm
The
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 04:00:51 +0800, Zechy Wong wrote:
Hi, something happened when I tried to run texteroids.
An X window was open, and when I ran texteroids a black box
appeared briefly before disappearing. These are the messages I got:
%% DPS Client Library Warning:
Auto-launching
Ummm,
Excuse me but you are wrong. If you care to read
http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/RELNOTES2.html you will notice the line that
says:
-initial DPS extension support
If you still doubt me, then check out the xfree cvs repository:
http://cvsweb.xfree86.org/cvsweb/xc/lib/dpstk/ or
Ummm,
Excuse me, but you are wrong
The RELNOTES2 is actually incorrect. There is no extension. That
means server side support. There is however client side support.
What I mean by server extension, is when you do 'xdpyinfo' and
it lists the extensions. DPS is not one of those extensions.
Ok,
I forgot the fact that building libdps depends on strict motif or gtk
libs, the former not being open source (nor legally available for
windows) and the latter still being ported to cygwin by Harold. I
apologize for the minor confusion, as I was still thinking in linux
mode. For the
Juliusz,
Is what Alan saying true? Are there no plans to have a server side DPS
extension officially in the xfree distribution? I noticed from the cvs
activity that the libraries are still being maintained...
Cheers,
Nicholas
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ummm,
Excuse me,
Huh ?
libdps in the XFree86 CVS does not depend on strict motif at all,
in fact it has no dependencies on motif, lesstif or anything 'tif.
It all builds straight from the CVS - all open source.
There is no DPS extension in XFree86 CVS either. Like I said the 4.1.0
RELNOTES are wrong. Although,
Nicholas,
There currently exists NO server side support in the current XFree86
CVS. Juliusz may have every intention of moving the code from
dps.sourceforge.net into the baseline XFree86 CVS at some point
in the future. But currently it ain't there. Probably because,
as far as the webpage is
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh ?
libdps in the XFree86 CVS does not depend on strict motif at all,
in fact it has no dependencies on motif, lesstif or anything 'tif.
It all builds straight from the CVS - all open source.
Yes you are right for the core library, but some
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:03:54AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh ?
libdps in the XFree86 CVS does not depend on strict motif at all,
in fact it has no dependencies on motif, lesstif or anything 'tif.
It all builds straight from the CVS -
Alan,
I realize this point, but in light of recent debate, I wanted to submit an
inquiry to be updated on the status of his project, and any future plans.
This might be relevent to the list, as it was the whole purpose of the
initial question. Which, by the way, has caused you to rethink your
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 07:13:35AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Alan,
I realize this point, but in light of recent debate, I wanted to submit an
inquiry to be updated on the status of his project, and any future plans.
This might be relevent to the list, as it was the whole purpose of the
Diego,
Don't send 57 KB (or whatever) attachments to the Cygwin/XFree86 mailing
list. There are a few hundred subscribers and not all of them want to
receive such huge emails. It also puts an unnecessary burden on the mailing
list server. In the future please mail a link to the package or
Should lower the message size limit here? I think it's currently 100K.
cgf
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 05:40:04PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
Don't send 57 KB (or whatever) attachments to the Cygwin/XFree86 mailing
list.
Chris,
Hmm... when did you drop the message size limit to 100 KB? This messages
from 2002/04/06 has a roughly 200 KB attachment:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-04/msg00081.html
I looked back at the mailing list archives over the last 5 months or so and
I see no legitimate messages
Heh. Actually I set it to 100K after the referenced message came in.
100K is standard for some of the other mailing lists on sourceware.org.
I can't think of a good reason for having that large a message size in
a discussion list, though.
cgf
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:37:28PM -0400, Harold
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:37:28PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
I looked back at the mailing list archives over the last 5 months or so
and I see no legitimate messages without attachments that were larger
than 50 KB. I therefore request that the message size limit be dropped
to 50 KB.
Oops.
Cool.
Thanks,
Harold
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AmiWM Port
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:37:28PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
I looked
21 matches
Mail list logo
