Hi,
From: Gerald S. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:28:04 -0500
::I agree -rootless rocks. And a -systray option would be great.
It's rocking realy cool! :-)
::But one thing that I'd really like to be able to do now that
::-rootless is around is be able to have all X
Hi All,
I have a problem using a wireless card (3com) on my home network. I have a
basic wireless setup and a switched setup (for my servers). When using the
wireless card I can use the internet fully and most applications are happy
with it. Bizarly though ipconfig /all doesn't list the
Chris,
XWin.exe doesn't directly get the list of available IP interfaces.
Rather, it has cygwin1.dll provide it with that list. There have been
problems before with Token Ring cards not showing up in the list of
adapters, as well as other little sublities that have been worked out
over the
Hi Harold,
I seem to have the latest drivers, I checked a couple of weeks ago, no harm
in doing so on a regular basis.
It just strikes me as weird that although I can telnet into a box over it I
can't start a server on it. Add that to ipconfig /all and it makes it very
confusing.
I'll send
Gerald S. Williams wrote:
Ultimately, what you really want is the ability to go both
ways--let X applications be managed by Windows and let
Windows applications be managed by X window managers (like
LiteStep only allowing X calls all the way down--I think
LiteStep uses GTK or something). Of
Guess I'm in the 1% then, I prefer fvwm to any other window manager I have
seen yet. It would be very, very cool to have fvwm on Windows.
/W
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Gerald S. Williams wrote:
Ultimately, what you really want is the ability to go both
ways--let X
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Well, that is not an opinion that I have ever seen expressed here to
date and I have not seen any developer announce that they are aiming to
provide such functionality. It has always been my understanding that
99% of people are interested in having MS Windows manage
Wilhelm,
Wilhelm Person wrote:
Guess I'm in the 1% then, I prefer fvwm to any other window manager I have
seen yet. It would be very, very cool to have fvwm on Windows.
/W
Are you referring to just having fvwm available for Cygwin/XFree86 or
are you referring to having the additional
Right now I use cygwin xfree for terminal emulation, more or less. But it
would be nice to be able to use an X windowmanager instead of Explorer. So
all the applications, even stuff like IE or WinAMP, are managed through
the X window manager.
As I understand it the current efforts with a
Wilhelm,
Oh yeah, I see your point. I don''t want to start up that discussion
again :)
Harold
Wilhelm Person wrote:
Right now I use cygwin xfree for terminal emulation, more or less. But it
would be nice to be able to use an X windowmanager instead of Explorer. So
all the applications, even
Chris Twiner wrote:
Hi All,
I have a problem using a wireless card (3com) on my home network. I have a
basic wireless setup and a switched setup (for my servers). When using the
wireless card I can use the internet fully and most applications are happy
with it. Bizarly though
There was some discussion on the list a while back regarding this very
thing. They are now using the win32-x11 mailing list. Here's a message
announcing the genesis of the project:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/win32-x11/2002-q3/msg00019.html
From: Gerald S. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas
I have tried to compile an X11 program from the Guile tutorial
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/guile-tut/tortoise1.html. I could
compile it but when I run it from bash, I get a core dump.
On the Linux system I use for my work, the program runs flawlessly. I cannot
tell if this is
13 matches
Mail list logo
