On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Hi Harold,
Server source, direct link:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-20030914-1740.tar.bz2 (127
KiB)
Could you commit these changes to the xoncygwin cvs? I can do too, but that
would very likely screw your working copy.
bye
Hi Harold,
Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 24 x 24 16 color icon is blue rather than black.
Oops, sorry, corrected in the attachment, I hope. Still looking for a
decent free icon editor that doesn't let me make mistakes like that
and doesn't have too many bugs.
I am not so
Benny,
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Harold,
Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) winmultiwindowwm.c - Add handling for WM_CHANGE_STATE IconicState
messages; minimize the associated Windows window when these messages
are received. (Harold L Hunt II)
xterm -iconic still doesn't
Regards,
Ashish Birla
Hi guys,
I'm trying to build and run DDD 3.3.7 on cygwin 2.340.2.5 running on Windows
2000. I've installled all the packages in the xfree tree.
To compile it I did:
bash ./configure
make
make install
That all seems to work fine. I startx which brings up the root x window with a
few x-terms
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regards,
Ashish Birla
http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_2.html#SEC13.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_[EMAIL
What Color Quality does the settings tab in your display properties show?
I have found a bug in the icon rendering that causes similar problems with
ddd, but only if using 24 bit color. Unfortunately, though the developers
have tried to help, I have not been doing my part and have not yet found
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm trying to build and run DDD 3.3.7 on cygwin 2.340.2.5 running on Windows
2000. I've installled all the packages in the xfree tree.
This fault does not completely end the application, as DDD is still running in
the background,
Hey Andrew,
I was running 32 bit colour mode. I switched to 16 bit and restarted X.
Nothing changed. I don't believe that is the problem in my case.
As to Alexander Gottwald suggesstion to stick with cygwin 1.3...can I ask where
I could get that version. Would it be as simple as replacing
Alexander,
Sure. I justed synched the xoncygwin cvs tree with Test99. There are
no differences now.
Harold
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Hi Harold,
Server source, direct link:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-20030914-1740.tar.bz2 (127
Steinar,
Perhaps Test99/4.3.0-9 fixes your problem?
Harold
Steinar Bang wrote:
Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you have Windows XP?
No. Win2k.
This is a known problem.
See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-09/msg00080.html
and following posts for more information.
Harold -
This is working. Many thanks for putting this in. Talk about service!
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Jason,
Yes, that is exactly what I wanted.
I don't have time for a formal release announcement now, but I just
posted XFree86-xserv-4.3.0-8 as a test release. You have to
manually
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Sounds good. Please resubmit your earlier patch when you have this
completed. It doesn't look like it would be a good idea to implement it
one half at a time. However, we can certainly wait on trying to make
the log either output to stdout or to a file... that could
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Please resubmit your earlier patch when you have this completed.
Stupid me. Has forgotten to attach the patch *g*.
bye
ago
NP: Welle:Erdball - Starfighter F-104G (2)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723Index: winmsg.c
Hi,
Applied the patchworks fine for me.
Colin
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
Thanks. Summed-up a bit too well for me, I'm not sure that I fully
understand.
Sorry to be so tearse. Let me explain.
The message suggests that Xt is no longer available, is that so? Do
you know what consequences that has for packages that used it?
No, you
Andy,
Andrew Markebo wrote:
libX11.a, and some more static libraries, can be found in XFree86-bin,
but I mean.. are they really needed here? Isn't the correct placement
in XFree86-prog?
/Andy
You must be looking at an old version of XFree86-bin. If not, please
point out the files to
Earle,
Thanks for the patch. I used it tonight since I finally updated my
Cygwin installation... I will be attempting to package a rebuild for
1.5.x tonight.
Thanks for contributing,
Harold
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy Harold, fast work on the WM_CHANGE update!
I had to reinstall
I am working on building a release for Cygwin 1.5.3. I am getting some
fun errors (listed below) related to changes to flex. I would
appreciate any help in pointing out how these problems should be fixed.
Please note that this is a build of the XFree86 4.3.0.1 CVS branch.
Thanks in advance,
Hey all,
I've been reading the thread: Re: xdvi: SIGSEGV in XtInitialize
Is this the same problem I am having. Using the 1.5 cygwin and X is the
problem. If it is, is there a workaround?
Thanks,
Yamin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Howdy Harold...
At 08:26 PM 9/15/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I am working on building a release for Cygwin 1.5.3. I am getting some
fun errors (listed below) related to changes to flex. I would appreciate
any help in pointing out how these problems should be fixed. Please note
that this is a
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:26:53PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I am working on building a release for Cygwin 1.5.3. I am getting some
fun errors (listed below) related to changes to flex. I would
appreciate any help in pointing out how these problems should be fixed.
Please note that this
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:52:11PM -0700, Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy Harold...
At 08:26 PM 9/15/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I am working on building a release for Cygwin 1.5.3. I am getting some
fun errors (listed below) related to changes to flex. I would appreciate
any help in pointing
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Does it work any better if you get rid of the '-l'?
cgf
Every other platform that uses flex uses the '-l'. I thought about
removing it too... the results are below (it didn't work).
Harold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/x-devel/4.3/build/std/config/pswrap
$ flex -t lexer.l
Christopher Faylor wrote:
That's funny because that is the version that is released for cygwin.
AFAICT, the latest version on ftp.gnu.org, in /pub/gnu/non-gnu/flex,
is flex-2.5.4a.tar.gz.
cgf
Well, whatever is wrong with 2.5.31, installing the 2.5.2 test release
solves the problem for 'pswrap'.
xc/config/cygwin.cf/BuildDPS was defined to NO. The reasoning behind
this was that DPS was not available on Cygwin.
However, it seems that there was never a BuildDPS flag being checked by
the rest of the build system. This flag seems to have always been
BuildDPSLibraries. Thus, the BuildDPS
Howdy...
At 11:53 PM 9/15/2003 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 07:52:11PM -0700, Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
I have just d/l'd and installed the version of flex straight from
ftp.gnu.org, and it compiles everything exactly as before, pswrap and the
old lex grammer file
[tempted to post to -apps, but not breaking the thread just yet]
Brian Ford writes:
I am sorry you too had to waste your time on this, but I am pretty sure
that the problem is well summed up in:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-09/msg00227.html
Thanks. Summed-up a bit too well
I am sorry you too had to waste your time on this, but I am pretty sure
that the problem is well summed up in:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-09/msg00227.html
cgf, it looks like even you fell for it somewhat. Maybe the note to
cygwin-apps idea wasn't so misplaced. :-)
--
Brian
29 matches
Mail list logo
