Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Christopher Faylor wrote: > Angelo Graziosi wrote: > >>Even using the snapshots, the problem remains and every time one needs >>to rebase all one must reinstall libncurses7-5.3-4 if one wants Emacs >>to work. > >Since this has nothing to do with Cygwin, AFAICT, there is no reason to >think that a

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Angelo Graziosi wrote: as the title of this mail says, it is Emacs (21.2-13, 21.3.50-2, started from X), NOT XEmacs (21.4.17-1, 21.5.16-1), that has problems after rebasing all the system. Fine, Emacs, XEmacs, whatever. That's not the point The problem. There are applicati

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Charles Wilson wrote: > *I* wonder, if xemacs were rebuilt against the CURRENT ncurses > libraries (libncurses8), would it still have similar problems -- e.g. > would you need to rebaseall and then reinstall libncursesEIGHT? > > If so, it's a problem I need to track down, as the ncurses > mainta

Re: My attempt to use Cygwin seems doomed to failure in spite of...

2005-09-16 Thread Dan Armbrust
Kind of off topic, but and i use my modem/router's configuration to not expose my PC to the internet, rather than running a PC firewall. This does not give you the same protection as running a PC firewall. A PC firewall allows you to determine which applications are allowed to make connect

RE: Page Up and Page Down

2005-09-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Reid Thompson wrote: if nothing else, remap the sequences in your .[g]vimrc file(s). that's a backwards solution (but as a last resort ;-) Also, use setup to download rxvt and see if that provides you a better 'terminal' no - just to refresh my memory I ran it just no

RE: My attempt to use Cygwin seems doomed to failure in spite of...

2005-09-16 Thread Reid Thompson
John Ormerod wrote: > ... all the willing help I've received - esp from Reid. I do > appreciate you all taking the time to give me info and clues etc. > > My conclusion is there is something on my system that > prevents Xwin.exe and / or xterm.exe from completely initialising. > > I've removed mo

RE: Page Up and Page Down

2005-09-16 Thread Reid Thompson
Mike Hicks wrote: > Hi. > > I have what appears to be a plain US 104-key keyboard > manufactured by/for Compaq. Using xterm, when I press the Pg > Up key on the number keypad, I get the character sequence > ^[[5~ and I get ^[[6~ for Pg Dn (^[ is actually a single > character, escape). However, t

Re: Page Up and Page Down

2005-09-16 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Mike Hicks wrote: Hi. I have what appears to be a plain US 104-key keyboard manufactured by/for Compaq. Using xterm, when I press the Pg Up key on the number keypad, I get the character sequence ^[[5~ and I get ^[[6~ for Pg Dn (^[ is actually a single character, escape).

My attempt to use Cygwin seems doomed to failure in spite of...

2005-09-16 Thread John Ormerod
... all the willing help I've received - esp from Reid. I do appreciate you all taking the time to give me info and clues etc. My conclusion is there is something on my system that prevents Xwin.exe and / or xterm.exe from completely initialising. I've removed most of the original text of this ap

Page Up and Page Down

2005-09-16 Thread Mike Hicks
Hi. I have what appears to be a plain US 104-key keyboard manufactured by/for Compaq. Using xterm, when I press the Pg Up key on the number keypad, I get the character sequence ^[[5~ and I get ^[[6~ for Pg Dn (^[ is actually a single character, escape). However, the Page Up and Page Down keys i

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:26:26PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Even using the snapshots, the problem remains and every time one needs >to rebase all one must reinstall libncurses7-5.3-4 if one wants Emacs >to work. Since this has nothing to do with Cygwin, AFAICT, there is no reason to think th

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Angelo Graziosi
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Harald Joerg wrote: > Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The problem is that after "rebaseall" Emacs does not works, it takes > > all the CPU and its window does not appear so that one can only kill > > its process. > > > > After the new release of rebase-2.

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Charles Wilson
Angelo Graziosi wrote: After the new release of rebase-2.4-1, the problem remains BUT this time reinstalling, with "setup", ONLY the package libncurses7 (whose current release is 5.3-4), EMACS works again! Rebasing all and then reinstal

Re: Emacs problem after rebaseall: some progresses?

2005-09-16 Thread Harald Joerg
Angelo Graziosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As you can see in the mailing lists, I have posted this question > a few times. > > Now I have discovered somethings at which you can give a more adeguate > answer. > > The problem is that after "rebaseall" Emacs does not works, it takes > all the CP