On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:48:44PM +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote: > On 21/01/2011 04:38, Frederick D. Hansen wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:37 +0000, Jon TURNEY wrote: > >> On 18/11/2010 12:33, Frederick Hansen wrote: > >>> Just FYI, after upgrading to xorg-server 1.9.2, any attempt to run in > >>> fullscreen results in an error. Downgrading to version 1.8.2 seems to > >>> correct the issue. Running either version in multiwindow also works. > >>> > >>> The contents of Xwin.log are shown below: > >>> > >>> > >>> Welcome to the XWin X Server > >>> Vendor: The Cygwin/X Project > >>> Release: 1.9.2.0 (10902000) > >>> Build Date: 2010-11-03 > >>> > >>> XWin was started with the following command line: > >>> > >>> /usr/bin/XWin -fullscreen -depth 8 -clipboard -silent-dup-error
By the way, on my machine, this is just: X :0 -multiwindow > >> [snip] > >>> [ 30091.406] (EE) XKB: Could not invoke xkbcomp > >>> [ 30091.406] (EE) XKB: Couldn't compile keymap > >>> [ 30091.406] XKB: Failed to compile keymap > >>> [ 30091.406] Keyboard initialization failed. This could be a missing or > >>> incorrect setup of xkeyboard-config. > >>> [ 30091.406] > >>> Fatal server error: > >>> [ 30091.406] Failed to activate core devices. This was the same for me. > >> Are you sure that removing -fullscreen allows the X server to start > >> properly? I didn't have it in the first place. > I use XP SP3. I can't reproduce this problem. > > The problem going away when you remove (and hence prevent from loading) the > dynamically loaded swrast_dri.so *really* makes this look like a remap > problem. I'm on Windows 7. Renaming /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so fixed the problem for me. I then renamed it back and ran rebase on it with the defaults used in rebaseall. X is still starting up. I then created rebase.lst using the commands used in rebaseall. /usr/lib/dri/swrast_dri.so is in there. But I have run rebaseall immediately prior to starting X and it was still failing to start. So it does appear to be a rebase problem, and I have no clue why rebaseall couldn't fix it. (It was completing successfully.) > There is some work upstream to remove this rather pointless fork/exec of > xkbcomp and replace it with libxkbcommon, but that now seems unlikely to > appear in X server 1.10. > -- > Jon TURNEY > Volunteer Cygwin/X X Server maintainer -- Reinier Post -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/