Re: [packages] gtk+, glib, imlib

2002-07-12 Thread Ian Burrell
. The external mode probably is easier to write only the wrapping code is needed. - Ian -- Ian Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Using only the X server of Cygwin

2002-07-07 Thread Ian Burrell
that are completely necessary: XFree86-base, XFree86-bin, XFree86-etc, XFree86-xserv, and XFree86-lib. - Ian -- Ian Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Cygwin/XFree86 - patches up to Test59

2002-06-18 Thread Ian Burrell
to the XFree86 developers and added to their CVS tree. - Ian -- Ian Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Cut down xfree server for XDMCP only

2002-06-15 Thread Ian Burrell
the questions? setup.exe is great for flexibity with different options for getting and selecting packages. For a school install, the location and packages can be fixed in advanced and the questions reduced to the minimum. - Ian -- Ian Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Cut down xfree server for XDMCP only

2002-06-14 Thread Ian Burrell
. - Ian -- Ian Burrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Building XWin only

2002-06-07 Thread Ian Burrell
Jehan Bing wrote: I would like to try a quick hack in XWin. So I follow the instruction in http://cygwin.com/xfree/docs/cg/prog-build-native.html. But then, it rebuild everything everytime. Is there a way to rebuild XWin without having to redo everything (no clean, no doc, no fonts, no

Re: bash ...

2002-04-25 Thread Ian Burrell
Scott Alexander wrote: If you have XWin.exe in the /usr/x11R6/bin directory then it should be installed. Im not sure what doesn't exist when you say: and X is a soft link to XWin (which doesn't exist) In the .tgz packages, /usr/X11R6/bin/X was a symlink to XWin. With Cygwin, XWin

Re: FW: Problem: extreme speed difference NT4 Win98SE runing Xfree

2002-04-17 Thread Ian Burrell
Uwe Schmidtmann wrote: So I guess it is the difference between NT optimization and Win9x. It could also be a difference in multitasking. I wouldn't be surprised if Win98 was slower in multitasking between the X server and clients especially with the Cygwin library and socket

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] cygwin/xfree86 setup.exe packages available forcomments and testing

2002-04-17 Thread Ian Burrell
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:02:51AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote: Looks like you figured out upset. Sorry about not responding. Actually, I did the same thing that Ian did and reverted to the upset from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src in the directory: winsup/cinstall/temp

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-16 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: Ooos... upon actually looking at the list of files I realized that you converted the standard XFree86 tar-gzip files into tar-bz2 files, which isn't really what we are trying to do here. Chris was asking that the XFree86 Cygwin-Setup package files be turned into tar-bz2

Re: XFree86 4.2.0 under Cygwin on Win98 w/ i810 won't display CDEfro m HPUX

2002-04-15 Thread Ian Burrell
Michael Reaser wrote: Unfortunately, the PC has an i810, so XWin is giving me fits. It works fine from another PC without the Intel 810 chipset, and works right if I just invoke it from the Bash shell using The chipset shouldn't matter one bit. XWin doesn't use the XFree86 video

Re: How do I run it?

2002-04-15 Thread Ian Burrell
Perry Hutchison wrote: OK, I've installed Cygwin and XFree86 on a Windows 95 system. When I try to run C:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\XWin.exe, I get an error box: Error Starting Program A required .DLL file, CYGWIN1.DLL, was not found. That file does exist, in

Re: XDMCP and Redhat 7.2

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Burrell
Matthew Bradford wrote: First, thank you very much for your time and attention. Now onto the results of your last email: I've tried that before, but I tried it again just to be sure... and still no go. did you get my previous email talking about the connection refused issue? I think

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-11 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: That sounds fine. Can I also request that you use a seperate variable for the server version number? I'd ask that because the server will tend to get updated often while most of the other packages will never be updated. I'm really looking forward to these packages

Re: xfree packages

2002-04-10 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so XFree86 is the way that the package names need to be spelled. Also, I request that you keep the XFree86-xserv package, as that will allow us to realize the immediate benefit of being able to release the Test-**

Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
Christopher Faylor wrote: Yep, as Robert indicated, this has been possible for a while. For Cygwin/XFree86, what I'd like to do is have you all come up with a few .tar.bz2 files which install into a /usr/X11R6, /etc/X11, etc. I repackaged the current .tgz files as .tar.bz2 files. I

Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
Robert Collins wrote: I'm not clear not the hierarchy there - that reads like a list to me. You've got two clauses you can independently use to make a hierarchy and package dependencies - category:(i.e. the devel tarball belongs in XFree86 and in Devel) and requires: (i.e. the server

Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
Christopher Faylor wrote: Yes, a -75dpi part of a tar file will look like a version number. Can you use an underscore instead? I could use an underscore. I got it to work by changing it to dpi75. Shouldn't the name in the setup.ini file override that version number parsing? - Ian

Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
Christopher Faylor wrote: Name? Do you mean version? If you put a version in setup.hint it is currently ignored. The name from the @ line and the version header could be used to override the parsing of file names into name and version. - Ian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

xfree packages

2002-04-09 Thread Ian Burrell
I finished making some xfree packages. They are distributed binary archives repackaged as cygwin packages. I made a package directory that can be used with setup.exe from a local directory and over the network. I changed my mind about the division of the packages I proposed. I got rid of the

Re: info: single install xfree86 + minimal cygwin?

2002-04-08 Thread Ian Burrell
Christopher Faylor wrote: The base cygwin install provides, er, a base cygwin install. That's the default for the Cygwin installation. There is currently no XFree86 package in the cygwin installation at all. They could create a custom install if they wanted. The Cygwin setup program

Re: Status of seamless integration?

2002-04-03 Thread Ian Burrell
Michel Bardiaux wrote: Aye, there's the rub. When the X application pops up a menu, it must grab the keyboard and the *whole* screen. In other words, a system modal window is required, which means one can't use an internal WM but must use MS-Windows as WM - while still being responsive to

Re: correct place for xmodmap / how to automize keyboard-layout-setting for Xfree86 ?

2002-04-02 Thread Ian Burrell
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Ulrich Diez wrote: I installed Cygwin and Xfree86 these days on my computer. Actually I have no experience with them. I wanted to make the X-Window-System accepting german keyboard-layout, therefore I downloaded a german Xmodmap-file. When I use

Re: Status of seamless integration?

2002-04-02 Thread Ian Burrell
Harold Hunt wrote: No one is working on it. In fact, no one has been working on much of anything related to Cygwin/XFree86 lately. What would be needed to do it? How much work would it be? - Ian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.znark.com/

Re: Status of seamless integration?

2002-04-02 Thread Ian Burrell
Alan Hourihane wrote: A lot of work. I've done most of the re-writing of the span functions into their native GDI counterparts. That's a good start. Where can I find the native GDI changes? Are they checked in? My impression is that mode isn't included into the server by default. What is