as well.
-Original Message-
From: Harold L Hunt II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:32 AM
To: cygx
Subject: Packaging question
We should be putting bin/*.dll in the bin package and
lib/*.a in the
prog package, correct?
Currently we are putting both bin/*.dll
We should be putting bin/*.dll in the bin package and lib/*.a in the
prog package, correct?
Currently we are putting both bin/*.dll and lib/*.a in bin.
Putting the DLLs in bin is correct because you need the shared libraries
in order to run, which is why lib/*.so are put in bin on other
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We should be putting bin/*.dll in the bin package and lib/*.a in the
prog package, correct?
Yes.
Any comments?
No. Go on.
bye
ago
NP: Stark - Wield (Kinetic)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 12:31:40PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We should be putting bin/*.dll in the bin package and lib/*.a in the
prog package, correct?
Wouldn't they go in a lib package?
cgf
Oddly enough, the lib package for XFree86 distributions doesn't seem
to have the link libraries in it. They put some other random stuff in
there. Sure, it is silly, but that's the way they do it. The prog
package is the one you need if you want includes and libs.
Harold
Christopher Faylor
