Jon TURNEY wrote:
jose isaias cabrera wrote:
Ken Brown wrote...
What's the reason for launching everything using sh rather than bash?
If I'm reading the bash documentation correctly, it means that
~/.bash_profile won't get executed (though it would get executed if
it were renamed
jose isaias cabrera wrote:
Ken Brown wrote...
What's the reason for launching everything using sh rather than bash?
If I'm reading the bash documentation correctly, it means that
~/.bash_profile won't get executed (though it would get executed if it
were renamed ~/.profile).
Ken
I've
2009/6/23 Jon TURNEY:
Always assuming that /bin/bash exists, or that /bin/sh is bash is probably
bad style for portability across unicies.
However, in this specific case, it's probably ok.
You never know. If posix_spawn() ever gets implemented in Cygwin to
avoid the slowness of fork(),
Ken Brown wrote:
On 6/17/2009 3:17 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+ emacs execbash -l -c /usr/bin/emacs
notepad execnotepad
xload execxload -display %display% # Comment
}
The most important part of this is changing the way emacs is called;
the original version
On 6/20/2009 4:43 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Ken Brown wrote:
I
prefer bash -l -c /usr/bin/emacs so that the bash initialization
files are processed before emacs starts. For various reasons, I want
the environment inside emacs to be the same as the usual bash
environment. I suspect that most
Ken Brown wrote...
What's the reason for launching everything using sh rather than bash?
If I'm reading the bash documentation correctly, it means that
~/.bash_profile won't get executed (though it would get executed if it
were renamed ~/.profile).
Ken
I've always wondered the same
On 6/17/2009 3:17 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
+ emacs execbash -l -c /usr/bin/emacs
notepad execnotepad
xload execxload -display %display% # Comment
}
The most important part of this is changing the way emacs is called;
the original version didn't work at all
Ken Brown wrote:
I recommend that the xorg-server maintainers consider the following
patch to system.XWinrc:
--- system.XWinrc.orig 2009-02-22 12:27:28.0 -0500
+++ system.XWinrc 2009-06-09 11:57:50.328125000 -0400
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@
// Make some menus...
menu apps {
-
I recommend that the xorg-server maintainers consider the following
patch to system.XWinrc:
--- system.XWinrc.orig 2009-02-22 12:27:28.0 -0500
+++ system.XWinrc 2009-06-09 11:57:50.328125000 -0400
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@
// Make some menus...
menu apps {
- xterm exec