Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Matt Wilkie
I haven't seen an answer to this one yet. Is that because no one knows? I'm in the same boat. -matt wilkie Randall R Schulz wrote: Hi, I installed XFree86/Cygwin via the semi-manual procedure that predates the release of Setup.exe packages. I want to know how I should handle

RE: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Harold Hunt
Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages I haven't seen an answer to this one yet. Is that because no one knows? I'm in the same boat. -matt wilkie Randall R Schulz wrote: Hi, I installed XFree86/Cygwin via the semi-manual procedure that predates the release

Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Randall R Schulz
Matt, Well, after waiting a while for some feedback, I took the plunge. I don't think there's a problem but... When (or after) I run XFree86/Cygwin, my system develops serious stability problems. The last time it happened, I first noticed that my dual-CPU system was showing only one CPU in

RE: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Robert Collins
Randall, theres nothing in X or Cygwin that could cause a CPU to disappear on you. Rob

RE: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Randall R Schulz
Robert, No, I really didn't think so, but I was hoping that if someone saw the symptoms and the specific graphics hardware I was using they might have a specific recommendation or some diagnostic information for me. And I assume that the _apparent_ loss of a CPU was not actually that, but

Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Charles Wilson
Randall R Schulz wrote: More problem symptoms followed. When the boot process completed the hardware scan and got to the point where the Welcome to Windows 2000 low-resolution splash screen would be taken down and the monitor resolution switched, I instead got a long period of disk

RE: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:09 PM Actaully, I think the long delay was the copy-on-reboot stage of the cygwin upgrade. I vaguely remember something about XFree needing to update a LOT of in use files, so

RE: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:41 PM To: Charles Wilson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages Charles, Wouldn't that copy-on-reboot

Re: Legacy Installation of XFree86/Cygwin vs. Setup.exe XFree86 Packages

2002-05-09 Thread Matt Wilkie
Okay, thanks Harold (and the others who've chimed in in other messages). I'll let you know what happens. It will take awhile though, I have to go find someone with bandwidth and cdburner. :) cheers, -matt Harold Hunt wrote: No one knows. You can install with setup.exe over top of your