RE: Mozilla vis-a-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Ken Thompson
: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:37 PM To: Randall R Schulz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mozilla vis-a-vis Cygwin I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Hi, A while back there was some talk

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Randall R Schulz
Michael, Oh, yeah... Another D'Oh! moment: Now that you mention it, I remember your post. Sorry to act like it was a discovery. Apparently the people who earlier mentioned an interest in Mozilla under Cygwin / Cygwin-XFree86 had only an idle interest. I'll admit it's not a priority for me, I

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Michael F. March
I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Hi, A while back there was some talk about the feasibility of a Cygwin-based Mozilla. In perusing the release notes for Mozilla 1.4

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Earle F. Philhower III
Howdy Michael, At 11:24 AM 6/17/2003 -0700, you wrote: Anyway.. I guess what I expected from my May 10th FYI was at least a private email or two from people who would be interested on working such a project. From now on I will try to be more clear. Like Ken Thompson said, that's just they way

Re: Mozilla vis-à-vis Cygwin

2003-06-17 Thread Larry Hall
Michael F. March wrote: I posted the same thing last month and no one seems to care. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg00599.html Define 'care'. I personally find this interesting. However, I felt no burning need to share my sentiments on the subject with the list (previously). If