From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nikolaus Bates-Haus)
Subject: Re: cx-logos
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:13:37 -0500
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-02/msg00234.html
Logo by Tucker McLean; I like it.
Yes, that's a nice one.
PROTECTED];
Saurabh Nupur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: cx-logos
Yes, I like this one the best as well. I believe it is very important to
convey that this is a port of the XFree86 software. This logo does it
well
with it's 86. Might
]
Subject: Re: cx-logos
Hey,
I sure as heck am listening! I got a big ego trip when I read this
message. The GIMP .xcf file is attached to this message.
Tucker
PS: Keep me updated as I am not subscribed to the mailing list
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:13:37PM
Nupur,
I like these... keep it up.
Harold
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Nupur Saurabh
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 4:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Brian Genisio
Subject: Re: cx-logos
hi all,
i made some changes as per
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:18:12PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
It would be best if you didn't send 193 KB attachments to the entire mailing
list (I don't know how many people that is, but it could be a few hundred).
518, actually! Wow. That includes 122 who are subscribed to the digest.
cgf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cx-logos
Hey,
I sure as heck am listening! I got a big ego trip when I read this
message. The GIMP .xcf file is attached to this message.
Tucker
PS: Keep me updated as I am not subscribed to the mailing list
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:13
Hi,
This is a GIMP .xcf file, if you want just the Cygwin part, just use
that set of layers. If you would like me to separate them, I'll be happy
to do that.
Tucker
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 06:43:50PM -0800, Tucker McLean wrote:
Hey,
I sure as heck am listening! I
It is a good point that maybe just CX is not enough and it should be Cygwin
+ X logos but nupur's logo is also much easier on the eye than Chris's.
Vivid red and green on a bright blue background - that is violent on the
eyes. Long ago in the time of eight-color displays there were no other
Yes, I like this one the best as well. I believe it is very important to
convey that this is a port of the XFree86 software. This logo does it well
with it's 86. Might I suggest also incorporating some identification of
Cygwin? There are two logos I have seen (www.cygwin.com), the one that
You're right. I missed the message when it came through;
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-02/msg00234.html
Logo by Tucker McLean; I like it.
-nik
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:04:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Nikolaus Bates-Haus
On Friday 5 Apr 02, Nikolaus Bates-Haus writes:
You're right. I missed the message when it came through;
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-02/msg00234.html
Logo by Tucker McLean; I like it.
Yes, this one is very good IMO.
David
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Nikolaus Bates-Haus wrote:
You're right. I missed the message when it came through;
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2002-02/msg00234.html
Logo by Tucker McLean; I like it.
Me too. A lot. I don't know if Tucker is still listen, but I'm
hello all,
i made some logos.
http://www.geocities.com/nupursarpal/logo_2.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/nupursarpal/logo_3.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/nupursarpal/logo_4.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/nupursarpal/logo_1.jpg
suggestions and comments are welcome
nupur
13 matches
Mail list logo
