When perusing the website for news, it would be useful if the pages were
marked (in their source) as generated or manually updated. For the former
(unless they're generated on demand), a modification date would also be
useful. For the latter, an RCS/CVS/etc identifier to distinguish
successive
Thomas Dickey wrote:
When perusing the website for news, it would be useful if the pages were
marked (in their source) as generated or manually updated. For the former
(unless they're generated on demand), a modification date would also be
useful. For the latter, an RCS/CVS/etc identifier to
Thomas Dickey wrote:
When perusing the website for news, it would be useful if the pages were
marked (in their source) as generated or manually updated. For the former
(unless they're generated on demand), a modification date would also be
useful. For the latter, an RCS/CVS/etc identifier to
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Thomas Dickey wrote:
When perusing the website for news, it would be useful if the pages were
marked (in their source) as generated or manually updated. For the former
(unless they're generated on demand), a modification date would also be
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Would CVS identifiers still be useful for whatever you are trying to do?
Maybe I'll start adding them as comments for starters but still keep
the hand-modified date for each page.
That's what I do, e.g.,
Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Would CVS identifiers still be useful for whatever you are trying to do?
Maybe I'll start adding them as comments for starters but still keep
the hand-modified date for each page.
That's what I do, e.g.,
On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Okay.
Each page should now have:
HEADER MODIFIED: $Date$ $Author$
LEFT SIDEBAR MODIFIED: $Date$ $Author$
BODY MODIFIED: $Date$ $Author$
FOOTER MODIFIED: $Date$ $Author$
that's better.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
