On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
1) We are building gen_matypes.c and we are supposed to create an executable
that will be used during the compilation process to build a header file called
``matypes.h''. However, this executable is being built with ``cc'' (it isn't
clear if this is
Jehan,
Here is a new patch and the files that you are missing:
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-scrollbars-20020711-1128.diff.bz2
(12 KiB)
http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/xwin-scrollbars-newfiles-20020711-1128.tar.bz2
(9 KiB)
Let me know what you think of the new patch
Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
1) We are building gen_matypes.c and we are supposed to create an executable
that will be used during the compilation process to build a header file called
``matypes.h''. However, this executable is being
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the value for
the i686 define is still being substituted into our includes path. Any ideas?
Harold
depending in programs/lbxproxy/os...
make[4]:
Harold L Hunt wrote:
Charles Petzold's book says that you only want to pass FALSE if you will be
making other function calls that will result in the scrollbars being redrawn,
so that you can avoid excessive redrawing. When we call SetScrollInfo with a
new position, that is it. We only make
good day to all.
Will you explain me what should I do to configure the X correctly? The X
fails to find the xterm, twm and xsetroot... Almost nothing happens, just a
X window... :-(
A good location is also appreciated
Thanks in advance,
Dmitry.
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the value for
the i686 define is still being substituted into our includes path. Any ideas?
That
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
I have already made such a patch to my local tree. It works fine. I thought
I made a post a day or two ago with a patch for cross compiling? I thought it
had just such a patch in it? Am I losing my mind?
Hm, such a patch never reached me. Just a
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing
the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the
value for
the i686 define is still being
Lapo Luchini wrote:
on its way was a bit optimistic.. the simple --with-xaw3d
configure switch leads to some problems... things defined twice.
Strange as configure detects everything correctly.
/usr/X11R6/lib//libXt.a(Intrinsic.o)(.text+0x10):Intrinsic.c: multiple
definition of
Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
I have already made such a patch to my local tree. It works fine. I thought
I made a post a day or two ago with a patch for cross compiling? I thought it
had just such a patch in it? Am I losing my
Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harold L Hunt wrote:
8) I added WM_MAXIMIZE to the window style when -scrollbars is passed.
This
allows one to maximize the Cygwin/XFree86 window. However, there are a
few
problems here... such as, what is a maximized 800x600 window on a 1024x768
screen?
Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the value for
the i686 define is still being
Nicholas Wourms [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing
the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is
Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harold L Hunt wrote:
4) When a user does specify a visual size with -scrollbars, we make the
initial window as large as possible and make the visual the same size as
the
specified size. We show the scrollbars only if necessary (i.e. we hide
them
if the user
Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
Alexander,
Unfortunately, we still have to #undef i686. I just tried removing the
``#undef i686'' and the results are below. The problem is that the value for
the i686 define is still being
Hi all,
I'm really glad to see XFree86 for Cygwin! But I wonder if there is there
a way to get XFree86 and Windows XP to share the same desktop like you can
do with Hummingbird eXceed? I don't like for XFree86 to take over my
whole screen. I'd like to be able to see my XP programs and the X
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Why is this naming convention being used? That is a relic of B20, we
shouldn't use that anymore.
Don't know. Once upon a time, i started building the crosscompile gcc,
binutils and so on and catched the first name i could find. The cygwin
target is
Nope.
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Steven Whatley wrote:
Hi all,
I'm really glad to see XFree86 for Cygwin! But I wonder if there is there
a way to get XFree86 and Windows XP to share the same desktop like you can
do with Hummingbird eXceed? I don't like for XFree86 to take over my
whole
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Harold L Hunt wrote:
make CROSSCOMPILEDIR=/cygwin/bin World World.log 21
Are you talking about imakemdep_cpp.h being built during the World make, or
are you doing this during a seperate step?
It's build during make World. Here's a part from the log
cd ./config/imake
Harold L Hunt wrote:
Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harold L Hunt wrote:
8) I added WM_MAXIMIZE to the window style when -scrollbars is passed.
This
allows one to maximize the Cygwin/XFree86 window. However, there are a
few
problems here... such as, what is a maximized 800x600 window on a
Alexander,
So this seems to be normal. For cygwin, there is
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
#define MacroIncludeFile cygwin.cf
#define MacroFile cygwin.cf
#define cygwinArchitecture
#define i386Architecture
#undef i386
#undef __i386__
#undef _X86_
#undef __CYGWIN__
#endif /* CYGWIN */
We just
Alexander,
I don't know if you ever explicity described how you got around the
glibc_major and glibc_minor symbols not being defined. The fun error that I
get is below.
Harold
Building Release 6.6 of the X Window System.
I hope you checked the configuration parameters in ./config/cf
to see
23 matches
Mail list logo
