RE: problems with XFree

2002-07-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 11:20, Harold Hunt wrote: Jehan, Excellent summarization of the thread regarding how we can add /usr/X11R6/bin to the path. Looks like we had Dave Cook and Robert Collins discussing the best way to do things but then the thread died. I don't really think that I

/etc/profile package maintainer (Was: problems with XFree)

2002-07-25 Thread David Starks-Browning
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes: I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file. All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it. Hardly an onerous role, yet no one seems willing to do it. As soon as someone emails me with

Re: /etc/profile package maintainer (Was: problems with XFree)

2002-07-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote: On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes: I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file. All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it. Hardly an onerous role, yet no one

RE: /etc/profile package maintainer (Was: problems with XFree)

2002-07-25 Thread Morrison, John
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote: On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes: I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file. All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package

RE: /etc/profile package maintainer (Was: problems with XFree)

2002-07-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:40, Morrison, John wrote: From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote: On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes: I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external

Re: problems with XFree

2002-07-25 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Jehan, As a rule of thumb, packages should *never* modify the /etc/profile script (even if you do back it up). This is a big no-no, as most *nix people would tell you. If you insist on getting into a discussion on why this is, then so be it. Instead, create 2 scripts (a csh and a sh) and drop

[ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Harold et al., After a brief discussion this morning, Ralf has given me permission to package QT-2.3.1 and release it to the Cygwin community. I would like to have it under the XFree86 dir, since it is a fully native X library. This release has been throughly tested by us over on the

Re: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:05:52AM -0700, Nicholas Wourms wrote: Harold et al., After a brief discussion this morning, Ralf has given me permission to package QT-2.3.1 and release it to the Cygwin community. I would like to have it under the XFree86 dir, since it is a fully native X

Re: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 22:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Are you sure that we don't get licensing issues here? AFAIK, Qt is (roughly) only free when running on a free OS. Basically we're still running on Windows... http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/ Summary, 2.2 and later is QPL

RE: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Harold Hunt
Well, remember also that the X11 version is licensed under the GPL, so it is fine. They do make some other versions that are not yet licensed under the GPL. The native Windows version used to be non-GPL, but I think I remember seeing something in the news about this changing a few months ago or

RE: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Nicholas Wourms
--- Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, remember also that the X11 version is licensed under the GPL, so it is fine. They do make some other versions that are not yet licensed under the GPL. The native Windows version used to be non-GPL, but I think I remember seeing something in

Re: Finally on Sylpheed

2002-07-25 Thread Nicholas Wourms
--- Jim George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I say finally but of course the fun is just beginning for me:) I now have sylpheed (the X Mail Client) running under cygwin-X and it's very good, there are some items that could be beefed up/improved upon (and I shall offer whatever help I'm able to)

Re: Finally on Sylpheed

2002-07-25 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 23:16 2002-07-24, Jim George wrote: I say finally but of course the fun is just beginning for me:) I now have sylpheed (the X Mail Client) running under cygwin-X ... Can the lis let me know if there is interest in a X Mail Client for cygwin, in which case I'll investigate becoming a

Re: problems with XFree

2002-07-25 Thread Jehan
Nicholas Wourms wrote: As a rule of thumb, packages should *never* modify the /etc/profile script (even if you do back it up). This is a big no-no, as most *nix people would tell you. If you insist on getting into a discussion on why this is, then so be it. Instead, create 2 scripts (a

Re: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Ralf, Since KDE on Cygwin might eventually depend on this Qt package, why don't you guys decide together what the best location would be? I really have no idea where to put it, so I'm all for just putting it somewhere and cleaning up the mess later when we learn what we did wrong. The LSB

Re: [ITP]: Qt-2.3.1

2002-07-25 Thread Nicholas Wourms
--- Harold L Hunt II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ralf, Since KDE on Cygwin might eventually depend on this Qt package, why don't you guys decide together what the best location would be? I really have no idea where to put it, so I'm all for just putting it somewhere and cleaning up the

RE: Obtaining Hummingbird-like behavior

2002-07-25 Thread Brian Dunbar
Harold, I'd like to contribute. My handicaps would be Time. I'm moving from Texas to San Diego in a few weeks. Same company, better job. You know what that involves. Skill. I'm but a humble system admin - my coding skills (basic PERL, shell scripting aside) are weak to non-existent*. So

Re: Case Closed (was Re: Help with fixing x2x...)

2002-07-25 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Thomas, Excellent. In xwinclip I calculate the maximum socket number just like you are doing: /* Find max of our file descriptors */ iMaxDescriptor = max (fdMessageQueue, iConnectionNumber) + 1; At least it is fixed now. Harold Thomas Chadwick wrote: Well, I figured it out. The

Re: problems with XFree

2002-07-25 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Let me see if I understand what is going on here: We are debeating whether to: 1) Modify /etc/profile, which is not installed via a package, but is created directly by setup.exe. 2) Add two scripts, one for bash-style shells and one for c-shell-style shells to /etc/profile.d/. These

Re: problems with xfree

2002-07-25 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 04:47:39PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote: Let me see if I understand what is going on here: We are debeating whether to: 1) Modify /etc/profile, which is not installed via a package, but is created directly by setup.exe. 2) Add two scripts,

/etc/profile /etc/profile.d/ (was: problems with XFree)

2002-07-25 Thread Max Bowsher
As I understand it, the whole point of /etc/profile.d/ is to allow packages to put their own startup scripts there and not modify /etc/profile - the underlying reason being that package management generally does a good job of adding and removing files, but changing them is fraught with

Re: Finally on Sylpheed

2002-07-25 Thread Jack Larsen
Hi Jim, I use cygwin-sylpheed for almost an year. It has become my main email client. Of course I am interested that anybody becomes the maintainter of this great program. Furthermore I am interested in an official cygwin glib/gtk port. -Jack