Finally, I understand why, at some point, all the app-defaults disappeared.
I had to fix them manually, now I know the cause.
Graham Bloice wrote:
Installing LessTif-0.93.18-3 creates a directory in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 named
app-defaults. This overrides the symbolic link placed there by
hi
i am a newbies with cygwin and need some help.
i have install with sucess cygwin and xfree and sshd on 2 computers and i
try lunch by ssh a distant process on xfree as explain in Cygwin/XFree86
User's Guide.
i do (inside xterm in xfree of coursse) the
ssh -X -l administrateur 192.168.0.19
Dear Friend, Hi! I hope everything is going well with you.
Insurance Agents like me are constantly having to evaluate new
products, new hybrids, etc. I wanted to let you know about one of
these newish products -- life insurance that actually includes
provisions (in the form of riders) for
Dear Friend, Hi! I hope everything is going well with you.
Insurance Agents like me are constantly having to evaluate new
products, new hybrids, etc. I wanted to let you know about one of
these newish products -- life insurance that actually includes
provisions (in the form of riders) for
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, J S wrote:
Hi,
When I try to run the command:
XWin -query smpd9 -fp tcp/smpd9:7100 -from a217447
that brings up the solaris xdmcp session if I'm running XFree86 on win
XP/2K
or NT. But if I try to run this on windows 95, it bombs out.
J S wrote:
Fatal server error:
XDMCP fatal error: Session declined No valid address
And yes I have read the FAQ and used the -from flag. There aren't any errors
in the xdm logs, so I tried to run the xdm in debug:
xdm -udpPort 6556 -nodaemon -debug 10 -config
Why this port? The
--- Alexander Gottwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit : J S wrote:
Fatal server error:
XDMCP fatal error: Session declined No valid address
And yes I have read the FAQ and used the -from flag. There aren't
any errors
in the xdm logs, so I tried to run the xdm in debug:
xdm
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
xdm -udpPort 6556 -nodaemon -debug 10 -config
Why this port? The default port is 177.
Alexander, this exactly Microsoft problem : M$ is building its products
thinking all people is using defaults, hiding some bugs that appear
only in some cases.
If I'm
Sylvain,
I am not understanding why your response was appropriate. The default
port for XDM has nothing to do with Microsoft, unless Microsoft has
decided to use port 177 for one of their products. If that was the
case, then a simple mention that ``Product Foo'' uses port 177 would
have
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 04:33:26PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I am not understanding why your response was appropriate. The default
port for XDM has nothing to do with Microsoft, unless Microsoft has
decided to use port 177 for one of their products. If that was the
case, then a simple
Okay, okay, but I didn't want to be that hard on Sylvain as he is a good
contributor to our discussions... I just wanted to put up a friendly
reminder that everyone, I more so than others, should sometimes tone
down our messages. That's all.
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03,
Okay, okay, but I didn't want to be that hard on Sylvain as he is a good
contributor to our discussions... I just wanted to put up a friendly
reminder that everyone, I more so than others, should sometimes tone down
our messages. That's all.
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Dec
Ah ha... okay, but in this case it would be good to at least rule out
the non-standard port as a possible culprit. Once the port is ruled
out, we can move on to other possible solutions.
Harold
Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
You're correct, I should have said 'product foo'...
I took Microsoft as
Yup, you can specify the port number. From the ``man Xserver'' page:
XDMCP OPTIONS
X servers that support XDMCP have the following options.
See the X Display Manager Control Protocol specification
for more information.
-query host-name
Enable XDMCP
That's exactly what I have read in Alexander's answer:
= Why this port? The default port is 177.
Excuse me.
Your response would be barely understandable if someone had said Hey
don't use a non-standard port! but given that there was no hint of
that
in Alexander's response and it was very
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:05:00AM +0100, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
That's exactly what I have read in Alexander's answer:
= Why this port? The default port is 177.
Excuse me.
Um, that was a private message. Poor netiquette, there.
cgf
16 matches
Mail list logo
