RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-22 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Danilo, Thanks for the report. I am working on fixing that problem right now. Harold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Danilo Turina Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Danilo Turina
I tried: XWin.exe -engine 1 in 24bpp mode crashes in 32bpp mode works J S wrote: Same for me. XWin.exe -engine 1 -rootless crashes. JS. > The real problem here may be the way that the GDI DIB engine handles 24 > bpp... not necessarily anything wrong with the MultiWindow mode. This seems

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Erik Frisk
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: > Erik, > > Great! Okay, one last one before I will have to wait until this evening > to do some debugging of the GDI DIB engine: please run the following and > report your results: > XWin.exe -engine 1 crash with the following in XWinrl.log ddxP

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread J S
Another crash! Again works OK if I set my display to 16bpp though. $ ./XWin-Test73-DEBUG.exe -engine 1 Segmentation fault (core dumped) u752359@A217447D /cygdrive/d/downloads $ cat /tmp/xwinrl.log ddxProcessArgument - Initializing default screens winInitializeDefaultScreens - w 1152 h 864 winInit

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Harold L Hunt II
JS, Excellent. Could you please try the following as well: XWin.exe -engine 1 Thanks so much for testing, Harold J S wrote: And if I change my display to 16 bpp, multiwindow works. Same for me. XWin.exe -engine 1 -rootless crashes. JS. > The real problem here may be the way that

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Erik, Great! Okay, one last one before I will have to wait until this evening to do some debugging of the GDI DIB engine: please run the following and report your results: XWin.exe -engine 1 Thanks so much for testing, Harold Erik Frisk wrote: The real problem here may be the way that the

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread J S
And if I change my display to 16 bpp, multiwindow works. Same for me. XWin.exe -engine 1 -rootless crashes. JS. > The real problem here may be the way that the GDI DIB engine handles 24 > bpp... not necessarily anything wrong with the MultiWindow mode. This seems > quick realistic, sinc

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread J S
Same for me. XWin.exe -engine 1 -rootless crashes. JS. > The real problem here may be the way that the GDI DIB engine handles 24 > bpp... not necessarily anything wrong with the MultiWindow mode. This seems > quick realistic, since the GDI DIB engine is not used unless specified or > unless

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Erik Frisk
> The real problem here may be the way that the GDI DIB engine handles 24 > bpp... not necessarily anything wrong with the MultiWindow mode. This seems > quick realistic, since the GDI DIB engine is not used unless specified or > unless you are using the MultiWindow mode, so a bug in the GDI DIB

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Harold L Hunt II
ECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] Hi Harold, some good news. I tried it with colordepth 16 and then it worked like a charm. Haven't tried it more than opening an emacs but that seemed to work just fine. Do you still want me to try the -clipboard things? (I did n

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Erik Frisk
Hi Harold, some good news. I tried it with colordepth 16 and then it worked like a charm. Haven't tried it more than opening an emacs but that seemed to work just fine. Do you still want me to try the -clipboard things? (I did not use the -clipboard option in my previous trials, I only started wi

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Harold L Hunt II
ime that a tiny little bug had something to do with the color depth. Thanks so much for testing, Harold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Frisk Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ser

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread Erik Frisk
Hi Harold, here is the latest XWinrl.log for the XWin-Test73-DEBUG.exe.bz2 binary. Hope this helps. Regards, Erik winDetectSupportedEngines - DirectDraw4 installed winDetectSupportedEngines - Returning, supported engines 001f InitOutput - g_iNumScreens: 1 iMaxConsecutiveScreen: 1 wi

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-21 Thread J S
CTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 15:04:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from sources.redhat.com ([66.187.233.205]) by mc3-f14.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.560

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-20 Thread Harold L Hunt II
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] Thanks for your efforts on this, > Erik and JS, > > Try the new Test73 release (4.2.0-21). The new release has a much more > robust way of initializing the Multi-Window Window Manager that should take &g

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-20 Thread Erik Frisk
Thanks for your efforts on this, > Erik and JS, > > Try the new Test73 release (4.2.0-21). The new release has a much more > robust way of initializing the Multi-Window Window Manager that should take > care of your crashes on startup. If not, it should at least allow for > better reporting o

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-19 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Erik and JS, Try the new Test73 release (4.2.0-21). The new release has a much more robust way of initializing the Multi-Window Window Manager that should take care of your crashes on startup. If not, it should at least allow for better reporting of errors. Do not run Test73 in gdb; that will n

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-18 Thread Harold L Hunt II
/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test72-DEBUG-2.exe.bz2 (2.8 MiB) Thanks so much for testing this, Harold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Frisk Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 4:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-18 Thread Erik Frisk
Hi Harold, I tried your DEBUG build just now and unfortunately no change. The end of XWinrl.log is included at the end of this mail. I do not know if this is of any help to you experts, but before it crashes the harddisk becomes very busy for a few seconds and stops when the XWin-binary core-dum

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II
] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] I am beginning to think that the DISPLAY=:0.0 has something to do with these crashes. If I recall correctly, specifying a display name such as :0.0 means that you should connect using UNIX domain sockets, which are emulated in Cygwin

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II
4:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] I am beginning to think that the DISPLAY=:0.0 has something to do with these crashes. If I recall correctly, specifying a display name such as :0.0 means that you should connect using UNIX domain sockets

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II
I am beginning to think that the DISPLAY=:0.0 has something to do with these crashes. If I recall correctly, specifying a display name such as :0.0 means that you should connect using UNIX domain sockets, which are emulated in Cygwin using TCP/IP sockets. We should change XWin.exe to connect to

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Erik Frisk
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote: > JS, > > I know what I want you to do: > > Run XWin.exe without gdb, and send in the last few lines of XWinrl.log. > I need to know if the last message in that log is ``calling pthread...'' > or something else entirely. By continuing with c in gd

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Harold L Hunt II
lf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:14:47AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: JS, Looks like we might have a pthreads problem, but I need you to run the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Alexander Gottwald
Christopher Faylor wrote: > It looks like this is dying in a DLL somewhere. 'info dll' should help > tell what the 0x100f8628 address is related to. However, it would certainly > help if you built debugging versions of the X DLLs so that symbol info would > be available. It doesn't seem to be d

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
libkernel32_a_iname () >#13 0x007df252 in cygwin_crt0 () >#14 0x0040103c in mainCRTStartup () >#15 0x77e992a6 in _libkernel32_a_iname () >(gdb) c >Continuing. > >Program exited with code 0305400. >(gdb) where >No stack. >(gdb) > > >>JS, >> >>Plea

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-17 Thread J S
ng list. Thanks for testing, Harold -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:14:

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD] On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:14:47AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: >JS, > >Looks like we might have a pthreads problem, but I need you to run the >new debug build below before I can tell: There have been s

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 08:14:47AM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote: >JS, > >Looks like we might have a pthreads problem, but I need you to run the >new debug build below before I can tell: There have been some pthreads fixes in the latest snapshot if anyone wants to give that a try. cgf

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread J S
OK I've done that, and there is DEFINITELY only 1 cygwin1.dll JS, Running ``find'' in Cygwin does not search all of your drives, not even all of your local drives. It only searches within your Cygwin installation directory. I want you to go into Windows Explorer, right-click on your C driv

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
JS, Running ``find'' in Cygwin does not search all of your drives, not even all of your local drives. It only searches within your Cygwin installation directory. I want you to go into Windows Explorer, right-click on your C drive and do a search for cygwin1.dll. Then I want you to do it agai

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread Alexander Gottwald
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, J S wrote: > Hi Harold, > > Is the line below "fbblt.c: No such file or directory" relevant at all? This means you don't have the sources installed. Or gdb can not find them. bye ago -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 126018723

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread J S
Hi Harold, I'm happy to do the testing, I'm just worried in case we find out it was something really stupid! Anyway, I'm sure there's only one cygwin1.dll. Is the line below "fbblt.c: No such file or directory" relevant at all? $ find / -name cygwin1* /bin/cygwin1.dll /usr/bin/cygwin1.dll $ mo

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread Harold L Hunt II
JS, Looks like we might have a pthreads problem, but I need you to run the new debug build below before I can tell: http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test71-DEBUG-2.exe.bz2 (2.9 MiB) When you searched your system for multiple copies of cygwin1.dll, you did search ALL drives (incl

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-16 Thread J S
Harold, Lots of debug info here. I have added more info at the bottom to show what I get when I run xwin without the -multiwindow flag as well. $ gdb ./XWin-Test71-DEBUG.exe GNU gdb 2002-12-19-cvs (cygwin-special) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-15 Thread J S
Thanks Harold, I'll have to test it out tomorrow now, as my W2k box is at work. JS. Hey, the debug build finished way early. Try this out: http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test71-DEBUG.exe.bz2 (2.9 MiB) Harold Harold L Hunt II wrote: I am building a debug version for you.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Colin, Thanks for the positive report. We are just trying to debug a segfault on startup problem. That is indeed how the multi-window mode is supposed to work. Thanks again, Harold Colin Harrison wrote: All seems OK for me..As a sanity check I run via startxwin.bat start XWin :2 -emulate3bu

Re:[ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Colin Harrison
All seems OK for me..As a sanity check I run via startxwin.bat start XWin :2 -emulate3buttons -multiwindow run xwinclip run xterm -sl 1000 -sb -leftbar -ms black -fg black -bg white -e /usr/bin/bash run xsetroot -solid steelblue and get a minimized 'X Cygwin/XFree86 rl' with a 'windows framed' '

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71 [DEBUG BUILD]

2003-01-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Hey, the debug build finished way early. Try this out: http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/XWin-Test71-DEBUG.exe.bz2 (2.9 MiB) Harold Harold L Hunt II wrote: I am building a debug version for you. I will post it sometime tonight as an unofficial release (i.e., without all the formal rel

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
I am building a debug version for you. I will post it sometime tonight as an unofficial release (i.e., without all the formal release announcements, etc.). Harold J S wrote: Yadin, I tried your suggestion but no success. JS. Hi, This version works great! All the menus are now updated correc

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread J S
Yadin, I tried your suggestion but no success. JS. Hi, This version works great! All the menus are now updated correctly (Win XP). Thanks Kensuke and Harold! To JS: Are you running any virus protection program? try disabling it. Yadin. "Harold L Hunt II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EM

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Yadin Y. Goldschmidt
Hi, This version works great! All the menus are now updated correctly (Win XP). Thanks Kensuke and Harold! To JS: Are you running any virus protection program? try disabling it. Yadin. "Harold L Hunt II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Links: > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Kensuke Matsuzaki
Harold, My previous patch is for menu problem, not segv. It sends ConfigureNotify event for clients when window move. Kensuke Matsuzaki

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Server Test 71

2003-01-15 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Links: I just posted Test 71 to the server development page: http://xfree86.cygwin.com/devel/shadow/ You can install the Test 71 package via setup.exe by selecting the 'test' package (and be sure to check the 'Bin' box): XFree86-xserv-4.2.0-19 Server Test Series binary and source code releases a