Harold,
after submitting this patch I recognized a rare case memory leak in
winMultiWindowGetClassHint() if the memory allocation for res_class fails.
This is fixed by the appended small patch, which is based on the previous one.
(Hope the indention is right)
Ralf
Hi Ralf, let me just say thanks for doing all the boring work of parameter
checking and NULL malloc fixes. Hacking code's fun, making it bulletproof
is just work...
At 08:02 PM 6/4/2003 +0200, you wrote:
after submitting this patch I recognized a rare case memory leak in
Harold Hunt wrote:
5) winclass.c, winclass.h - Rename these files to
winmultiwindowclass.c and winmultiwindowclass.h, respectively, since
they are only used in MultiWindow mode. Prefix the functions in these
files with MultiWindow. (Harold L Hunt II)
The appended patch contains some
Hi Harold,
One more thing about your new server test release where you broke
things up into smaller files and reworked the message loops:
It looks like the mouse button fix (where you release the
mouse outside of a window and X doesn't get notification so Xterm
keeps scrolling or emacs keeps
I didn't commit that because I was not convinced that it was entirely
proper. I also forgot about it :)
I would really like to implement hooks instead of adding more and more
timers (it was a timer, correct?).
Harold
Earle F. Philhower, III wrote:
Hi Harold,
One more thing about your new
Howdy,
At 09:32 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I didn't commit that because I was not convinced that it was entirely
proper. I also forgot about it :)
I would really like to implement hooks instead of adding more and more
timers (it was a timer, correct?).
It wasn't a new timer, it was just
I think the thing I didn't like about it was the fact that a few keys
were also being released and that wasn't explained very well. What is
up with that?
Harold
Earle F. Philhower III wrote:
Howdy,
At 09:32 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I didn't commit that because I was not convinced that
Hola,
At 09:43 PM 6/2/2003 -0400, you wrote:
I think the thing I didn't like about it was the fact that a few keys were
also being released and that wasn't explained very well. What is up with that?
?? That's actually the WM_KILLFOCUS call that releases the keys. I think
you've
still got that
