RE: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
The naming was probably inherited from linux, where it is possible to have both kde (1) and kde (2) and kde (3) all installed on the same machine. Therefore, each needs different basename. Yes, this is it. If the kde-cygwin folks want to maintain that package-name distinction, then

RE: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
The naming was probably inherited from linux, where it is possible to have both kde (1) and kde (2) and kde (3) all installed on the same machine. Therefore, each needs different basename. If the kde-cygwin folks want to maintain that package-name distinction, then they should just

RE: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-14 Thread Ralf Habacker
What about kde-x. Must it be named kde_x ? Couln't those fixes be included in the base xfree package? Having a package that overwrites a file from another package gives problems if you deinstall the latter: you lose the file from the first... Unfortunally for some reasons no, because 1.

Re: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-14 Thread Charles Wilson
Ralf Habacker wrote: The naming was probably inherited from linux, where it is possible to have both kde (1) and kde (2) and kde (3) all installed on the same machine. Therefore, each needs different basename. If the kde-cygwin folks want to maintain that package-name distinction, then

Re: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-08 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:16 PM and in setup.ini : @ kdelibs-2 Get rid of this. I suspect that it is confusing setup.exe. It should certainly do the right thing without it.

Re: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-08 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] upset would probably do the right thing with the above but I really don't see any reason to use it, regardless. I don't see any reason why a user would need to know that these are kdelibs-2 when it

Re: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-08 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: upset would probably do the right thing with the above but I really don't see any reason to use it, regardless. I don't see any reason why a user would need to know that these are kdelibs-2 when it is pretty obvious from the version number. The naming was

Re: Incorrect version in packages names

2002-07-08 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
and in setup.ini : kdelibs-2 Get rid of this. I suspect that it is confusing setup.exe. Found in /etc/setup/installed.db : kde-x-1.2 kde-x-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2-1.2.tar.bz2 0 kde-x-1.3 kde-x-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3-1.3.tar.bz2 0 kdebase-2