Eric S. Johansson wrote:
I'll try some experiments to see if it's the same under XP as it is
under 2k, if XP works, I'll shovel some money into the furnace of Redmond.
I have confirmed that Windows 2000 has excessively high CPU loads with
cygwin X11 when combined with NaturallySpeaking at the
Rob Foehl wrote:
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
Soong, SylokeJ wrote:
My cygwin/x server processes are at 0% when not used.
They are near 0% even when xwin is receiving lots of screen update
from the
solaris client running SAS.
that's impressive. Before this problem
Soong, SylokeJ wrote:
My cygwin/x server processes are at 0% when not used.
They are near 0% even when xwin is receiving lots of screen update from the
solaris client running SAS.
that's impressive. Before this problem started if I start getting any
number of updates, the CPU load would
My cygwin/x server processes are at 0% when not used.
They are near 0% even when xwin is receiving lots of screen update from the
solaris client running SAS.
My last cygwin update was two weeks ago.
When was your last update and what were your updates?
(so that I know what to avoid updating).
I
-Original Message-
Subject: RE: high CPU load
My cygwin/x server processes are at 0% when not used.
They are near 0% even when xwin is receiving lots of screen
update from the solaris client running SAS.
My last cygwin update was two weeks ago.
When was your last update
