Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Lothar Brendel wrote:
More information as promised, after getting the new run and checkX
(run2) packages announced this morning.
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.2
0.3.2 announced? I didn't get any such message, and setup still only
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Any other ideas? I keep updating but so far all I can do is launch
an Xterm manually and clean up, then everything seems fine til the
next time I relaunch it.
---
Do you have
DISPLAY=:0
set in your Windows environment?
(system properties, Advanced, Env
Linda Walsh wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Any other ideas? I keep updating but so far all I can do is launch
an Xterm manually and clean up, then everything seems fine til the
next time I relaunch it.
Do you have
DISPLAY=:0
set in your Windows environment?
I didn't, but I do
On 12/03/2009 10:47 PM, Timares, Brian (Harris Corp.) wrote:
I do appreciate all the terrific replies--I've been on the net for
awhile and this is one of the friendliest lists I've been on.
Do you mind if I frame this and hang it on the Cygwin home page. ;-)
--
Larry Hall
More information as promised, after getting the new run and checkX
(run2) packages announced this morning.
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.2
- QUOTE -
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
The X window showed up, but it blew up real good (the windows
disappeared, then the X icon.
Hi!
More information as promised, after getting the new run and checkX
(run2) packages announced this morning.
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.2
0.3.2 announced? I didn't get any such message, and setup still only offers
0.3.1-1 to me.
vhaisbtim...@isb-timaresbrian-lt ~
$ XWin -multiwindow
[1]
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:25:14AM +0100, Lothar Brendel wrote:
More information as promised, after getting the new run and checkX
(run2) packages announced this morning.
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.2
0.3.2 announced? I didn't get any such message, and setup still only offers
0.3.1-1 to me.
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Just to be clear from the start, Cygwin 1.7 not 1.5.
ACK.
*blush* Sorry!
...
Thus, once more: What does
md5sum /usr/bin/checkX
yield?
a827086e9cbb331ef49d416b3cb1b135 or a36409714f5ce9d01e8dfb4cb38b7216?
The 2nd:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
[...]
Thus, once more: What does
md5sum /usr/bin/checkX
yield?
a827086e9cbb331ef49d416b3cb1b135 or a36409714f5ce9d01e8dfb4cb38b7216?
The 2nd:
vhaisbtim...@isb-timaresbrian-lt ~
$ md5sum /usr/bin/checkX
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.0
So, you've got the situation I surmised in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-11/msg00200.html
Grr, I saw that, went and _thought_ I got the right version but
it seems the right version
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
$ checkX -v
run2 0.3.0
So, you've got the situation I surmised in
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-11/msg00200.html
Grr, I saw that, went and _thought_ I got the right version
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
The X window showed up, but it blew up real good (the windows
disappeared, then the X icon. After a rebootit
didn't launch at all. I ran startxwin.sh from the Cygwin Bash
Shell, and it started.
At least we're getting *somewhere* :-)
Just to be clear from the start, Cygwin 1.7 not 1.5. And I tried to
make this clear. And I tried to not let Outlook's word-wrap inter-
fere.
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
My guess: It's the
I wrote:
And I tried to make this clear.
email -^
*sigh*
Sorry!
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Just to be clear from the start, Cygwin 1.7 not 1.5.
ACK.
[...]
i) ```time checkX -t 12''
How long does it take?
vhaisbtim...@isb-timaresbrian-lt ~
$ time checkX -t 12
real0m0.098s
user0m0.046s
sys 0m0.031s
And *that* shouldn't happen!
I
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
My guess: It's the old checkX-problem again because you're using
version
0.3.0-1 of the run2-package. Do to some reason unknown to me,
that's the default version. But we need 0.3.1-1,
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
[...]
Nothing works. 1.7 doesn't work for me out-of-the-box (yes, I ripped
it all out and tried it fresh :-)
I open a DOS box and check processes and see bash running with an l or
a 1 in the left columnn, but nothing appears. If I launch an Xterm
it opens up.
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
[...]
My guess: It's the old checkX-problem again because you're using
version
0.3.0-1 of the run2-package. Do to some reason unknown to me, that's
the default version. But we need 0.3.1-1, which you only get when
explicitely
Lothar Brendel wrote:
Timares, Brian (Patriot) wrote:
Lothar Brendel wrote:
My guess: It's the old checkX-problem again because you're using
version
0.3.0-1 of the run2-package. Do to some reason unknown to me, that's
the default version. But we need 0.3.1-1, which you only get when
Tried
19 matches
Mail list logo
