RE: Repackaging of WindowMaker and openbox needed ?

2002-05-13 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Ton van Overbeek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 6:39 PM By the way, what is the best place to discuss X packaging issues, this list (cygwin-xfree) or cygwin-apps ? Yes. I'd suggest that any non-trivial discussions take place on

Re: Repackaging of WindowMaker and openbox needed ?

2002-05-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Ton van Overbeek wrote: Now it seems that there is a consensus that all X specific stuff should go in /usr/X11R6/bin, /usr/X11R6/lib, Well, if you call Chuck reversing his original position, and Harold agreeing with Chuck's new position, and Earnie smugly thinking 'I was right all along'

Re: Repackaging of WindowMaker and openbox needed ?

2002-05-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:38:42PM -0400, Harold L Hunt wrote: Now it seems that there is a consensus that all X specific stuff should go in /usr/X11R6/bin, /usr/X11R6/lib, Well, if you call Chuck reversing his original position, and Harold agreeing with Chuck's new position, and Earnie smugly

Re: Repackaging of WindowMaker and openbox needed ?

2002-05-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: Just to clarify, here's what I said: *I don't think I ever gave an opinion on the /usr/bin vs. */usr/X11R6/bin. My preference is that all official X stuff goes in */usr/X11R6/bin but that seems to be counter to the way most modern *distributions do things.