On 11/04/2009 05:05 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
I saw support for dual installations in a recent announcement on Cygwin's
main list. I've also seen quite a few problems reported against 1.7 in the
compatibility department, but I realize that gives no indication of the
number of users who don't hav
* Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: "http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#RSN :-)"
** LW wrote: "--I don't suppose you could express that in ISO format? :-)"
Larry Hall wrote:
Since you've asked this on multiple lists, I'm going to assume this is
more than just a humorous comment that you don't expect an answer t
On 10/29/2009 11:56 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#RSN :-)
---
I don't suppose you could express that in ISO format? :-)
Since you've asked this on multiple lists, I'm going to assume this is more than
just a humorous comment that you don't expect
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#RSN :-)
---
I don't suppose you could express that in
ISO format? :-)
How difficult would it be to turn on compiling in of the 'font-cache'
extension?
Impossible; support for the extension was completely removed from the
server over
On 29/10/2009 20:36, Linda Walsh wrote:
Does this mean it is a 'beta' or test version?
X11R7.5 is not a beta, it is a full release. Cygwin 1.7 is technically
still in beta, but is very usable and much improved over 1.5.
If it is a released version, will it be made available for the
release
Does this mean it is a 'beta' or test version?
If it is a released version, will it be made available for the
released version of cygwin (1.5). I've no idea when cygwin
will release 1.7 as being 'ready'...
How difficult would it be to turn on compiling in of the 'font-cache' extension? I use
