-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Fredrik Staxeng wrote:
> Is anything else but startx using mcookie? If not, why not move it there.
Because mcookie comes from util-linux, not xinit, and that's where it's
going to stay.
Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Mark Geisert writes:
>In the interests of PTC I could try to figure out a better package to contain
>chkdupexe, or mcookie for that matter. Or recode chkdupexe as a shell script.
Is anything else but startx using mcookie? If not, why not move it there.
--
Fredrik Stax\"ang | rot13: s...@hcqn
Yaakov writes:
> > Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related
> > install or update doesn't try to pull in perl? It gets tiresome having
> > to uncheck util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines
> > with setup.exe.
>
> I'm sorry you have something agains
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark Geisert wrote:
> Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related install
> or
> update doesn't try to pull in perl? It gets tiresome having to uncheck
> util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines with setu
...and I'm trying to compute in a perl-free environment. Yes, really.
Is there some way the packages could be reworked so that an X-related install or
update doesn't try to pull in perl? It gets tiresome having to uncheck
util-linux and perl every time I update my set of machines with setup.exe.
