Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, 5 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: The fact is, rxvt upstream is dead, dead, dead. It has shuffled off this mortal coil. Joined the choir invisible. It is an EX-terminal. The terminal is terminal. thanks for agreeing with me. It has no maintainer. Frankly, I prefer rxvt-unicode on

Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Charles Wilson
Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: The fact is, rxvt upstream is dead, dead, dead. It has shuffled off this mortal coil. Joined the choir invisible. It is an EX-terminal. The terminal is terminal. thanks for agreeing with me. It has no maintainer. Not so

Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 6 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: The fact is, rxvt upstream is dead, dead, dead. It has shuffled off this mortal coil. Joined the choir invisible. It is an EX-terminal. The terminal is terminal. thanks for agreeing

Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Thomas Dickey (Sun, 6 May 2007 10:49:23 -0400 (EDT)) On Sun, 6 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sat, 5 May 2007, Charles Wilson wrote: The fact is, rxvt upstream is dead, dead, dead. It has shuffled off this mortal coil. Joined the choir invisible. It is an

Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 6 May 2007, Thorsten Kampe wrote: You are confusing things. Quoting you: 'support is relative. There's apparently no X maintainer [...]'. If you don't 'care for the role of cygwin maintainer' then that's obviously nonsense as X is maintained upstream. not at all: X upstream doesn't

Re: Xterm, rxvt, mrxvt, etc....

2007-05-06 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Thomas Dickey (Sun, 6 May 2007 13:36:31 -0400 (EDT)) On Sun, 6 May 2007, Thorsten Kampe wrote: You are confusing things. Quoting you: 'support is relative. There's apparently no X maintainer [...]'. If you don't 'care for the role of cygwin maintainer' then that's obviously nonsense as X