Re: Updated: xorg-server-1.17.1-1 (TEST)

2015-02-16 Thread Michael DePaulo 
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Jon TURNEY
 wrote:
> On 15/02/2015 14:49, Michael DePaulo wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have experienced 2 regressions vs 1.16.3-1.
>> (In the results below, I am assuming 1 and 2 are the same
>> regression/issue, while 3 is separate.)
>
>
> Thanks for testing and reporting the problem.
>
> With the excellent detail in your email I was able to build a Centos 7 VM
> which reproduces the problem, which was due to the RANDR changes in 1.17.1-1
> not being quite correct.
>
> I've had a go at fixing this and uploaded a snapshot [1].  Perhaps you could
> try that and see if it improves things for you?
>
> [1]
> ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwinx/x86/XWin.20150216-git-2323ff7b08e56b79.exe.bz2

That fixes both issues. Thanks!

--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/

Re: Updated: xorg-server-1.17.1-1 (TEST)

2015-02-16 Thread Jon TURNEY 

On 15/02/2015 14:49, Michael DePaulo wrote:

Unfortunately, I have experienced 2 regressions vs 1.16.3-1.
(In the results below, I am assuming 1 and 2 are the same
regression/issue, while 3 is separate.)


Thanks for testing and reporting the problem.

With the excellent detail in your email I was able to build a Centos 7 
VM which reproduces the problem, which was due to the RANDR changes in 
1.17.1-1 not being quite correct.


I've had a go at fixing this and uploaded a snapshot [1].  Perhaps you 
could try that and see if it improves things for you?


[1] 
ftp://cygwin.com/pub/cygwinx/x86/XWin.20150216-git-2323ff7b08e56b79.exe.bz2



--
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ:   http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/