Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 8 19:07, Eliot Moss wrote: On 8/8/2011 5:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote: do newsize *= 2; while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *) result + size) newsize); My guess now is that there was some invalid pointer arithmetic somewhere that led to this, but I don't have time at the moment to

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 4:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 8 19:07, Eliot Moss wrote: On 8/8/2011 5:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote: do newsize *= 2; while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *) result + size) newsize); My guess now is that there was some invalid pointer arithmetic somewhere that led to

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Eliot Moss
On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703 while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *) result + size) newsize); (gdb) p /x size $1 = 0x101000 (gdb) p /x heapsize $2 =

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703 while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *) result + size) newsize); (gdb) p /x size $1 = 0x101000 (gdb) p /x heapsize

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 10:12 AM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703 while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *) result + size) newsize); (gdb) p /x

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 9 10:23, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 10:12 AM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703 while ((__malloc_size_t) BLOCK ((char *)

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 09/08/2011 11:21 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 9 10:23, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 10:12 AM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703

Re: Re: /bin/date differs 10-12 minutes from Windows time

2011-08-09 Thread Bernhard Voelker
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, Thorsten Kampe wrote: * Voelker, Bernhard (Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:28:42 +0200) I'm experiencing windows time (which is right) being constantly 10-12 minutes behind GNU's time: $ cmd.exe /c time /t ; /bin/date 09:21 Fri Jul 29 09:33:22 WEDT 2011 I've seens

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 11:21 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 9 10:23, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 10:12 AM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 7:19 AM, Ken Brown wrote: (gdb) thread 1 [Switching to thread 1 (Thread 19828.0x447c)] #0 0x00622ee0 in morecore_nolock (size=1052672) at gmalloc.c:703 703

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 12:20 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote: I'm pretty sure emacs [thinks it] doesn't even use the system heaps (sort of how cygwin doesn't use the windows heaps); from what I remember, the heap in [t]emacs is an .idata section of the image (12MB large on my version of emacs) which is supposed to

SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-09 Thread Gary
I'm having issues getting SSHD working on Windows Server 2003 64 bit. I've properly installed SSHD as a service but I receive the following error when starting the service from 'services.msc': 'The SSHD service on Local Computer started and then stopped.  Some services stop automatically if they

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ken Brown
On 8/9/2011 2:21 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 11:21 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: However, whatever you do, it will not really work. Keep in mind that the large address awareness only makes sense (and has any effect!) on systems which provide a large address area. To me the bottom line here

Re: emacs and large-address awareness under recent snapshots

2011-08-09 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 09/08/2011 10:33 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 2:21 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 8/9/2011 11:21 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: However, whatever you do, it will not really work. Keep in mind that the large address awareness only makes sense (and has any effect!) on systems which provide a large

fork: Resource temporarily unavailable: address space is already occupied

2011-08-09 Thread Heiko Elger
Hello, I know there are lots of such postings Resource temporarily unavailable. But using lates snapshot (2011-08-03): there are changes by C. Faylor printing cause of fork failure. I've gotten the following error message while running make in parallel using (make -j8). 0 [main] sh 8

is using old make.exe (3.80) (cygwin 1.5.x) within cygwin 1.7.x OK

2011-08-09 Thread Heiko Elger
Hello, cause of colon problems we have to use old make version 3.80 in cygwin 1.7.x. The binary make.exe is a copy of cygwin 1.5.x installation. Is it correct to use this version within cygwin 1.7.x? Or do I have to rebuild the binary? At the moment all seems to work fine - I only want to avoid

Re: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable: address space is already occupied

2011-08-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:51:32AM +, Heiko Elger wrote: Hello, I know there are lots of such postings Resource temporarily unavailable. But using lates snapshot (2011-08-03): there are changes by C. Faylor printing cause of fork failure. I can see I'm going to regret exposing these errors.

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: zsh-4.3.12-1

2011-08-09 Thread Peter A. Castro
An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.3.12-1) has been released and should be at a mirror near you real soon. This is an upstream release. NOTICE: === Version 4.3.12 has just been released. It is mainly a bugfix release with a few new features folded into it. This is a prelude to the coming

Re: SSHD Issue Windows 2003 64 bit

2011-08-09 Thread Csaba Raduly
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Gary wrote: I'm having issues getting SSHD working on Windows Server 2003 64 bit. I've properly installed SSHD as a service but I receive the following error when starting the service from 'services.msc': 'The SSHD service on Local Computer started and then

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 8 16:37, Warren Young wrote: On 8/8/2011 2:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 8 10:57, Warren Young wrote: Did you figure out your problem seeing the 256 px icon? I'm not sure what problem you mean. I can see the 256x256 icon just fine. I was half-remembering this message:

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 8 16:28, Warren Young wrote: On 8/8/2011 2:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: If you have a way to create a C which is not handdrawn *and* stands out, I would very much like to see it. That's why I quoted Andy: increasing the stroke width can help. By starting with a much thicker

Re: 256x256 px icons

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 9 09:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 8 16:37, Warren Young wrote: On 8/8/2011 2:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Aug 8 10:57, Warren Young wrote: Did you figure out your problem seeing the 256 px icon? I'm not sure what problem you mean. I can see the 256x256 icon

[patch/peflags] Allow to change PE header stack and heap sizes

2011-08-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Chuck, here's the change to peflags which allows to change the stack size and other stuff. What it exaclty allows right now is to change the following values: ntheader-OptionalHeader.SizeOfStackReserve Initial reserved size of the main application stack

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-09 Thread Dave Korn
On 27/07/2011 04:11, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: David, As mentioned recently on the list, due to Dave Korn's extended absence, I'll be maintaining our gcc packages. Since you maintain several GCC dependencies, we'll need to coordinate. Yaakov, how is this going? I see you haven't uploaded

Re: [ITP] pbzip2 (and what was the upshot on pbzip2/libbz2 incompatibility?)

2011-08-09 Thread Peter Li
On 8/8/11 9:08 PM, Peter Li wrote: On 8/8/2011 4:23 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: On 8/8/2011 12:46 PM, Peter Li wrote: As they distribute a windows binary with cygwin.dll, So, if the pbzip2 devs distribute a copy of cygwin1.dll, I assume they also abide by the GPL and distribute the sources for

Re: GCC dependencies (attn David Billinghurst)

2011-08-09 Thread David Billinghurst
On 10/08/2011 4:45 AM, Dave Korn wrote: On 27/07/2011 04:11, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: David, As mentioned recently on the list, due to Dave Korn's extended absence, I'll be maintaining our gcc packages. Since you maintain several GCC dependencies, we'll need to coordinate. Yaakov, how is

Re: [patch/peflags] Allow to change PE header stack and heap sizes

2011-08-09 Thread Charles Wilson
On 8/9/2011 8:19 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Chuck, here's the change to peflags which allows to change the stack size and other stuff. Cool, thanks. Here's the patch. Builds and works fine on Cygwin and x86_64-mingw64. Needs one small tweak for MSYS, but works fine after that.

connection refused (errno 111): unable to connect to X server

2011-08-09 Thread Joshua J. Yi
Hi All, I've been having this problem for a while now and I can't seem to figure out how to solve it. I've checked the FAQ, mailing lists, and done web searches, but unless I've missed something (quite possible!), the solution to my problem isn't out there. When I run startxwin in the bash

Re: segfault Xserver...current version (1.10, not 1.8)

2011-08-09 Thread Linda Walsh
Jon TURNEY wrote: Following the instructions at [2] to obtain an Xserver backtrace would also be of great help. [2] http://x.cygwin.com/devel/backtrace.html Reading symbols from /usr/bin/Xwin...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Attaching to program `/usr/bin/Xwin', process 5280 [New

Re: segfault Xserver...current version (1.10, not 1.8)

2011-08-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:55:31PM -0700, Linda Walsh wrote: Jon TURNEY wrote: Following the instructions at [2] to obtain an Xserver backtrace would also be of great help. [2] http://x.cygwin.com/devel/backtrace.html Reading symbols from /usr/bin/Xwin...(no debugging symbols

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog ntdll.h ntea.cc

2011-08-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2011-08-09 09:14:28 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog ntdll.h ntea.cc Log message: * ntdll.h (STATUS_NOT_FOUND): Define. * ntea.cc (read_ea): Return correct ENOTSUP rather than

src/winsup/cygwin ChangeLog heap.cc shared.cc ...

2011-08-09 Thread corinna
CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: cori...@sourceware.org 2011-08-09 12:00:28 Modified files: winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog heap.cc shared.cc shared_info.h Log message: * heap.cc (eval_initial_heap_size): New function fetching the heap size from

Updated: zsh-4.3.12-1

2011-08-09 Thread Peter A. Castro
An updated version of zsh (zsh-4.3.12-1) has been released and should be at a mirror near you real soon. This is an upstream release. NOTICE: === Version 4.3.12 has just been released. It is mainly a bugfix release with a few new features folded into it. This is a prelude to the coming