Thanks, Brian!
But what would be the final decision? As far as I
understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
right?
Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade
to some previous 1.5.25-x?
--
Alexey
Brian Dessent wrote:
The
On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote:
Thanks, Brian!
But what would be the final decision? As far as I
understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
right?
Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
NT-dll would be removed, I hope) or should I downgrade
to some
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:38:28PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
On 21 December 2007 12:41, Alexey Lyubimov wrote:
Thanks, Brian!
But what would be the final decision? As far as I
understand 1.5.x branch MUST support Win98. Am I
right?
Should I wait for 1.5.25-8 (where hard dependencies on
NT-dll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Alexey Lyubimov on 12/20/2007 6:38 AM:
After upgrading to cygwin 1.5.25-7 I get error message
from BASH every time I want to run cygcheck:
$ cygcheck
BASH: ./cygcheck: Function not implemented
Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usually
Eric Blake wrote:
Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usually capitalize it's name. You might have
That's a Win9x oddity.
The OS: Windows 98 SE
Rather old; I hope you're aware that cygwin 1.7.0 won't run on your OS,
and that, as bash maintainer, I no longer have access to Win98 to
investigate
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:15:11 -0800,
Brian Dessent brian[at]dessent[dot]net wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usually capitalize it's name. You might have
That's a Win9x oddity.
The OS: Windows 98 SE
Rather old; I hope you're aware that cygwin 1.7.0 won't run on your
On 20 December 2007 18:46, Jeff wrote:
This is exactly why I have 'File Monitor' from Sysinternals on my
system. Whenever I have an app that fails to start and produces some
incomprehensible error message (relative to my setup, current state of
my system, location of files, etc.), I run 'File
7 matches
Mail list logo
