Re: Bug: /registry file system doesn't return len of default value of keys
On Jun 29 15:22, Linda Walsh wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 28 20:25, Linda Walsh wrote: Known bug? Is it in the queue to be fixed someday? :-) Works in Cygwin 1.7 Hmmm...its still in testing? How stable is it? Quite stable, with kinks. I venture the guess that the number of bugs is not higher than with 1.5.25. They are just different. Am I going to inflict, upon myself, more pain than I gain? :-) Come on, whom do you ask? And BTW, what happened to 1.6? current release says its still at 1.5.25-15 The 1.6.x, 1.8.x numbers are reserved for the Red Hat supported releases. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Bug: /registry file system doesn't return len of default value of keys
On Jun 28 20:25, Linda Walsh wrote: Hi all, I've run into some weird behavior from the file-utils (grep, file) but I believe they may all be caused by the same root problem. The /prog/registry filesystem doesn't return the length of the 'default' value (often a string). Under /proc/registry/HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT/ I was grep'ing through .txt/@ which I expected to find the string txtfile, but, I think because it is 0 len, grep thinks it is a binary file (which I have my grep set to ignore). Known bug? Is it in the queue to be fixed someday? :-) Works in Cygwin 1.7 Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Re: Bug: /registry file system doesn't return len of default value of keys
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 28 20:25, Linda Walsh wrote: Known bug? Is it in the queue to be fixed someday? :-) Works in Cygwin 1.7 Hmmm...its still in testing? How stable is it? Am I going to inflict, upon myself, more pain than I gain? :-) And BTW, what happened to 1.6? current release says its still at 1.5.25-15 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
