Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-06 Thread JonY
On 10/05/2017 05:22 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > That is the problem. > It costed me one hour of my time, you could have done by yourself. > > > Jon, > let me know if you need help on updating binutils. > Thanks for the info, I will churn out a new version ASAP. signature.asc Description:

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-06 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 06/10/2017 00:13, 叶雨飞 wrote: Thanks all, Hope this issue can be resolved soon, and if there are anything need to be done from my part, just let me know and I am happy to help. Cheers. I presume Jon is on vacation. So short term use binutils 2.25 with test gcc-6.3 Regards Marco --

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-05 Thread 叶雨飞
Thanks all, Hope this issue can be resolved soon, and if there are anything need to be done from my part, just let me know and I am happy to help. Cheers. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-05 Thread Marco Atzeri
n 04/10/2017 03:28, Steven Penny wrote: On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:37:04, Marco Atzeri wrote: you wrote nothing at all. So it is difficult to understand what is your exact issue I wrote it 4 times: - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-09/msg00229.html -

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-04 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 04/10/2017 04:52, 叶雨飞 wrote: Guys, If someone could show me some instructions on how to build and release binutils for CYGWIN, I'm happy to do it this week. Cheers. Hi 叶雨飞, only the maintainer can release it. However to see how to build and test it, the easy way is to download the cygwin

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-03 Thread 叶雨飞
Guys, If someone could show me some instructions on how to build and release binutils for CYGWIN, I'm happy to do it this week. Cheers. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-03 Thread Steven Penny
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:37:04, Marco Atzeri wrote: you wrote nothing at all. So it is difficult to understand what is your exact issue I wrote it 4 times: - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-09/msg00229.html - http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2017-09/msg00289.html -

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-03 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 03/10/2017 13:49, Steven Penny wrote: On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 07:48:51, Marco Atzeri wrote: I assume it is one of the reason why the compiler and binutils you are using are still in test and not current @ mingw64-x86_64-binutils version: 2.25.0.1.23f238d-1 [test] version: 2.28.1.12c1f20d-1 @

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-03 Thread Steven Penny
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 07:48:51, Marco Atzeri wrote: I assume it is one of the reason why the compiler and binutils you are using are still in test and not current @ mingw64-x86_64-binutils version: 2.25.0.1.23f238d-1 [test] version: 2.28.1.12c1f20d-1 @ mingw64-x86_64-gcc-g++ version: 5.4.0-3

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-02 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 03/10/2017 03:25, Steven Penny wrote: Reposting because it is a new month. Here is a demonstration of the problem:    $ cat z.cpp    #include    main() {     std::cout << "cout test\n";    }    $ x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -static -o z z.cpp    $ ./z    Segmentation fault -

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-02 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 03/10/2017 04:02, 叶雨飞 wrote: Who is in charge of maintaining this package? Can we just upgrade to latest binutils? no top posting on this list. Please. the list of maintainers is at https://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint Are you sure that an upgrade solve the problem ? I am sure Jon will

Re: Segmentation fault with binutils 2.28.1

2017-10-02 Thread 叶雨飞
Who is in charge of maintaining this package? Can we just upgrade to latest binutils? On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Steven Penny wrote: > Reposting because it is a new month. Here is a demonstration of the problem: > >$ cat z.cpp >#include >main() { >