Buzz writes:
I was hoping for ``our'' man-maintainer, being much more knowledgeable
about such issues, to be proactive...
...If (s)he isn't I'll look into finding the upstream ``man''-list.
I will forward this issues to the upstream man maintainer.
Ciao
Volker
--
Op Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:01:26 -0600 schreef Eric Blake
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: According to Buzz on 10/15/2005 9:46 PM:
[(possibly stale) bash.1 about somewhere.]
: Hmm, I do have /usr/local/man on my manpath, and it did indeed have
: man1/bash.1, but I don't know if that affected things.
I
Op Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:11:00 +0200 schreef Dr. Volker Zell
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: Buzz writes:
: I was hoping for ``our'' man-maintainer, being much more knowledgeable
: about such issues, to be proactive...
: ...If (s)he isn't I'll look into finding the upstream
I tried info and man and could not find any information on wait. I want to
(using bash)
Did you try 'man wait'? That would have pointed you to 'man bash', where
as a bash builtin, wait is properly documented. Also, 'info bash' will tell you
about bash builtins, or you can try 'help wait' for
Siegfried Heintze wrote:
I tried info and man and could not find any information on wait. I
want to (using bash)
(1) How do I wait for multiple children and wake up when the first one
dies?
(2) Examine the status code of the dead child and possibly spawn a new
one?
Where is the
Op Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:45:06 + schreef Eric Blake
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[What the...]
: I tried info and man and could not find any information on wait. I want to
: (using bash)
:
: Did you try 'man wait'? That would have pointed you to 'man bash', where
Did /you/ try it?
It complains
.
stephan();
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bas van Gompel
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:46 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Where is documentation on bash wait?
Op Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:45:06 + schreef Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bas van Gompel on 10/15/2005 2:46 PM:
Did /you/ try it?
Yes, as bash maintainer, I /did/ try it. However, I didn't realize that
there was a typo in the upstream bash_builtins.1 manpage; I just supposed
that the text that was there
Op Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:11:53 -0600 schreef Eric Blake
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[Ahhh]
:
: According to Bas van Gompel on 10/15/2005 2:46 PM:
:
: Did /you/ try it?
:
: Yes, as bash maintainer, I /did/ try it. However, I didn't realize that
: there was a typo in the upstream bash_builtins.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Buzz on 10/15/2005 9:46 PM:
: Do you have a copy of bash.1 lying around somewhere?
:
: cygwin man pages are purposefully compressed, so it should be bash.1.gz.
I'm aware of that. I was WAGging you didn't get the error, having a
10 matches
Mail list logo
