Hi Thomas,
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on sourceware.
We just need to fetch a git repo or import the original svn repo.
Another good proposal which I must have overlooked on
On Jun 9 21:55, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 09.06.2015 um 11:56 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Jun 8 22:11, Csaba Raduly wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put
On Jun 8 22:11, Csaba Raduly wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on sourceware.
We just need to fetch a git repo or
Am 09.06.2015 um 11:56 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Jun 8 22:11, Csaba Raduly wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on sourceware.
We just need to fetch a git repo or import the original svn repo.
Another
On Jun 5 07:36, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on sourceware.
We just need to fetch a git repo or import the original svn repo.
Another good proposal which I must have overlooked on Monday, sorry.
Am 01.06.2015 um 17:50 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
...
We could also put mintty under the cygwin-apps cover on sourceware.
We just need to fetch a git repo or import the original svn repo.
Another good proposal which I must have overlooked on Monday, sorry.
Is there an option to import the
Am 02.06.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Tony Kelman:
• Yaakov could turn github/cygwinports into an organisation account
and give me admin rights for the mintty repository.
• I could create a dedicated account and repository.
• I could host mintty somewhere else.
There is also an inactive mintty user on
2015-06-04 8:29 GMT+02:00 Thomas Wolff:
I have acquired that account meanwhile but apparently it cannot be turned
into an org. account, rather it would need to be attached to a separate org.
account (weird policy).
Does this help?
On Jun 2 08:05, Thomas Wolff wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 10:36 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On May 31 23:15, Thomas Wolff wrote:
As a contributor to mintty, some sent me a notice discussing the move to
github
• Yaakov could turn github/cygwinports into an organisation account
and give me admin rights for the mintty repository.
• I could create a dedicated account and repository.
• I could host mintty somewhere else.
There is also an inactive mintty user on github, you could contact
github about name
Am 01.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Jun 1 18:14, Achim Gratz wrote:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I'd like to discuss what you (cygwin maintainers and others) think of
this move, whether it's good for mintty to be hosted on github.
...
And that question of yours is moot since mintty
Am 01.06.2015 um 10:36 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On May 31 23:15, Thomas Wolff wrote:
As a contributor to mintty, some sent me a notice discussing the move to
github
(http://www.reddit.com/r/cygwin/comments/37vgwi/what_happened_to_minttys_maintainer_andy_kopp/)
and now there is already a
Personally I feel that a platform like sourceforge provides a more
professional project environment which would provide more confidence in
stable project development.
What do you think?
Sourceforge is awful. It's incredibly unreliable, on a project I contribute
to where we deal with dozens of
On May 31 23:15, Thomas Wolff wrote:
As a contributor to mintty, some sent me a notice discussing the move to
github
(http://www.reddit.com/r/cygwin/comments/37vgwi/what_happened_to_minttys_maintainer_andy_kopp/)
and now there is already a github fork of mintty
Thomas Wolff writes:
I'd like to discuss what you (cygwin maintainers and others) think of
this move, whether it's good for mintty to be hosted on
github.
The first thing should really be to find out what Andy Koppe thinks
about this, or is there any information about his whereabouts that says
On Jun 1 16:16, Frank Fesevur wrote:
2015-06-01 10:36 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
It's not so much the hosting service providing the upstream repository
which concerns me, it's the lack of development, the lack of a responsive
maintainer, and the lack of a new, stable mintty package.
On 06/01/2015 10:14 AM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I'd like to discuss what you (cygwin maintainers and others) think of
this move, whether it's good for mintty to be hosted on
github.
The first thing should really be to find out what Andy Koppe thinks
about this, or is there
On Jun 1 18:14, Achim Gratz wrote:
Thomas Wolff writes:
I'd like to discuss what you (cygwin maintainers and others) think of
this move, whether it's good for mintty to be hosted on
github.
The first thing should really be to find out what Andy Koppe thinks
about this, or is there any
2015-06-01 10:36 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
On May 31 23:15, Thomas Wolff wrote:
As a contributor to mintty, some sent me a notice discussing the move to
github
(http://www.reddit.com/r/cygwin/comments/37vgwi/what_happened_to_minttys_maintainer_andy_kopp/)
and now there is already a github
On 2015-05-31 23:15, Thomas Wolff wrote:
As a contributor to mintty, some sent me a notice discussing the move to
github
(http://www.reddit.com/r/cygwin/comments/37vgwi/what_happened_to_minttys_maintainer_andy_kopp/)
and now there is already a github fork of mintty
21 matches
Mail list logo
