Petro wrote:
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
[...]
As I've written, the FBI should run quality house cleaning services
in large cities.
How do you know they don't?
In every office or factory I've ever been in, including government ones
where we kept paper copies of tax returns (yes folks,
"R. A. Hettinga" wrote:
[...]
I am not, of course, a banking lawyer, but I certainly hang out with enough
of those folks these days, I've certainly had enough of this stuff shoved
into my head over the years, and, I expect that to get a bank account
without a Social Security number in
Eric Cordian wrote:
Alan Olsen wrote:
[...snip...]
He seemed to think that the only target of this would be the government.
I think this is a reasonable observation. You really have to be acting
under color of authority to strongly alienate enough people, who have so
litle recourse
Posted without permission. You've probably seen it before it probably
isn't funny but I'd been drinking beer when i saw it I laughed:
NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF INDEPENDENCE
To the citizens of the United States of America,
In the light of your failure to elect a President of the USA and
No User posted:
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14686-2000Nov14.html
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 14, 2000; Page C1
In yet another bizarre twist to an already surreal campaign, the head
of Fox News's Election Night decision
Mac Norton wrote:
And then the locusts descend. And they feed. Because the ants
and the grasshoppers never could get their shit together.
0/10 for entomology. Locusts *are* grasshoppers :-)
Ken
Kevin Elliott wrote:
At 12:38 + 11/10/00, Ken Brown wrote:
But are there no rules in Florida allowing for a re-vote? If there
really are 19,000 spoiled papers from once county, that sounds "massive"
to me. It may not be fraud - the fools who designed the papers probabl
Tim May wrote:
The solution has been obvious for a long time: absentee ballots must
be received by the close of business on the polling day. Those who
know they are going to be out of their voting area must mail their
ballots in time to arrive. This eliminates this particular hazard.
When
ade
me an expert on the laws of a state I've never visited know nothing
about I suppose...)
Ken Brown (unfortunately a fan of elections and constitutions)
The voters will be able to suss it out without a website.
In the last UK general election about a couple of million voters very
precisely voted either for whichever of the Labour (who won overall) or
Liberal (came 3rd) candidates was most likely to beat the Conservatives
(who were thereby
There has recently been some discussion on UKcrypto of a hypothesised
eavesdropping-safe boot CD containing OS necessary software to get
encrypted IP links to a (predetermined?) safe site.
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/peter.fairbrother/
The "won't be able to import files" and so on sounds
priority and
scholarly recognition at UCL over here a couple of years ago - of course
the spooks don't get any outside their own fences, the poor little
lambs...
Ken Brown
Tim May wrote:
At 2:23 PM +0300 10/12/00, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bo Elkjaer wrote:
Note
Dan Geer wrote:
Wearing my "inventor" badge, I asked nearly every member of nearly
every panel what they they had to say about intellectual property
protection. This means that I asked the same question to samples
of size 4 of each of lawyers, accountants, entrepreneurs, noveau
riche
Asymmetric wrote:
That the list be changed so that un_registered email addresses cannot send
messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
[...snip...]
The benefits of having the list open to u_nsubscribed postings seem far
outweighed by the cost in time spent by everyone filtering
lcs Mixmaster Remailer wrote:
Quantum cryptography will be of little practical value for the average
person. That's because you need to get photons unchanged from one
person to the other. This requires either a line of sight or a fiber
optic cable, neither of which is likely to be
15 matches
Mail list logo
