Automated filtering is censorship.
We don't want censorship.
This is nonsense. Censorship is performed by government entities.
Last I checked, there's no state action here. Don't like it? Start
your own list. But don't whine.
-Declan
PS: Even your "predictable permutation" of
If someone has a better and simpler idea, I'd like to hear it.
just get the nodes to filter mails that don't have CPUNK in
the subject, and send the originator a mail explaining why
his mail bounced...
This is superior to clientside filtering, because the junk
doesn't eat bandwith, and no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just get the nodes to filter mails that don't have CPUNK in
the subject
Hashed and rehashed. Some anonymous remailers strip subject lines. If
the keyword is at the end of the subject, some mailers truncate long
subject lines. If the keyword is at the front, then
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 02:54:28PM -0400, Francis Litterio wrote:
BUT ... does a predicable permuting of the list address constitute
automated filtering? I think not. It's no more automated filtering than
is the trivial intelligence test that the list currently requires of all
posters
