At 9:25 PM -0700 on 9/11/00, petro wrote:
>>including subpoenas for, apparently now, Snowball's fur...
>>
> Funny you should mention Snowball...
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/hgmis/elsi/forensics.html
Heh.
That was my *point*, I think...
:-).
Cheers,
RAH
Who admits to listening to Nat
>At 9:25 PM -0700 9/11/00, petro wrote:
>>RAH:
But, again, I'm sure the thing was a spoof.
>>>
>>>Nope not a spoof.
>>>
>>>Heard it on NPR, and several other outlets the day it came out.
>>
>> I thought I remembered hearing about it as well, but I can't
>>find anything on CNN's web si
At 9:25 PM -0700 9/11/00, petro wrote:
>RAH:
>>> But, again, I'm sure the thing was a spoof.
>>
>>Nope not a spoof.
>>
>>Heard it on NPR, and several other outlets the day it came out.
>
> I thought I remembered hearing about it as well, but I can't
>find anything on CNN's web site, nor on
> But, again, I'm sure the thing was a spoof.
Nope not a spoof.
Heard it on NPR, and several other outlets the day it came out.
Remember, they use animal parts (bugs, plants, animal fur, whatever) in
forensics all the time.
The "request for fur" bit is probably a minor vamp of other requests f
--
At 09:20 AM 9/9/2000 -0700, A. Melon wrote:
> Some of that cat hair winds up at crime scenes, and can provide
> important clues to solving a crime if it can be traced to an
> individual cat, and from there to its owner. The DOJ is asking cat
> owners to voluntarily send in a sample
