steve mynott writes:
> "I'm a racist. I would say they're a clever race. I would say that as a
> race they are better at making money than I am. That's a racist
> remark. But they appear to be better at making money than I am. If I
> was going to be crude, I would say not only are they better
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 10:58:38PM -0700, Eric Cordian wrote:
> Much of the "evidence" used to paint Irving as a "Nazi" consisted of
> meticulous documentation of virtually every word he uttered since being
> targeted for deconstruction after the Zundel trial, the fact that after
> being attacke
Bill Stewart writes:
> On the other hand, today's papers report that David Irving, the
> Holocaust-denying history-reviser, lost his libel lawsuit against
> some people who wrote about him and the inaccuracy of his propaganda.
I read the judge's findings of fact, and some background on the case.
At 01:07 PM 4/1/00 -0800, Lizard wrote:
Yes, but this is the Internet, and with both you and Phil's longstanding
reputations, it's easy to discount ridiculous hyperbole. I doubt anyone
take Phill seriously enough that you'd have any case. I must confess that,
if asked, I'd have to testify that
The NYT today reports on the UK's Demon Internet paying
a wad of money to Laurence Godfrey, a physicist allegedly
libeled on a news group, soc.culture.thai, first on January 12,
1997, there again later, and subsequently on uk.legal.
Phill Hallam-Baker is mentioned as having been required
in a
