On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, John Young wrote:
> And you got to admit that it's weird that none of the early
> cypherpunks have been caught at, or accused, of sedition.
> Or even set up like Mitnick for high-profile prosecution.
Probably 'cause these days to get prosecuted you have to do more than just
At 9:31 PM -0500 on 3/4/00, John Young wrote:
> To read the stuff now is again electrifying.
Yup.
I got here in spring/summer of 1994, and I had the same experience when
Ryan's venona archives were up for a while a couple of years back.
The way I figure it, the loop probably started at about
At 6:31 PM -0800 3/4/00, John Young wrote:
>No, I had not read the early archives, at the time I got on
>board there was plenty going on to electrify 6 inches of callus
>off my near-dead carcass. Then, later, the early stuff disappeared
>with Bilblio, when I had assumed it would be around wheneve
No, I had not read the early archives, at the time I got on
board there was plenty going on to electrify 6 inches of callus
off my near-dead carcass. Then, later, the early stuff disappeared
with Bilblio, when I had assumed it would be around whenever
needed. And, then the Cyphernomicon was a r
At 3:57 PM -0800 3/4/00, John Young wrote:
>It's worth pondering what demonization and criminalization
>may evolve from close study of the early Cypherpunk archives
>made availalble a few days ago by Ralph Seberry :
>
> http://lanesbry.com/cypherpunks
>
>After a fews days of reading those remar
