Different standards aren't necessarily bad either. Local jurisdictions
have a substantial amount of leeway in ballot design in Florida,
which, Democratic partisan protests notwithstanding, is probably a
reasonable thing.
In other areas of the law, they have the opportunity to craft laws and
rules
At 11:17 PM -0500 12/10/00, Robert Guerra wrote:
>In article <001c01c062e0$5db95fc0$0100a8c0@golem>, "Me"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> i dont see why any of these methods are inherently
>> better/safer/more accurate than those used in florida.
>
>Counting a "X"'s I would think is easier than
In article <001c01c062e0$5db95fc0$0100a8c0@golem>, "Me"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there any benefit to the 'canadian system' above it's lack of
> lawyers?
Having a plethora of different standards sure doesn't help..
In Canada, and other countries there is a uniform ballot across the
coun
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Guerra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> personally, if I had a say I'd say they should adopt the
> same system Canada uses. They use a 100 year old
> system, had few if any recounts, and managed
> to count all thier manual ballots in less than 72 hours.
is there a
Declan:
I completely agree with you that internet voting isn't quite ready fom
prime-time just yet. But given the current snafu I highly suspect that
there will be a lot of interest in the field.
Certainly, I hope one of the few things the new congress will be able to do
is set-up a commissio
Robert,
With respect, you're joking, right?
The current system is flawed, true, but an Internet voting system
would likely suffer from far more serious security, authentication,
and fraud problems. This is a recurring topic of discussion in
cryptographic and computer-risks circles. Do some web se
