>places, explaining to them why we don't build in back doors. And,
>suprisingly, when you go and talk to them, rather than hissing and
>shouting, they listen.
They listen, but do they hear?
--
A quote from Petro's Archives:
**
"Despite almost
>On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:56:56PM -0500, David Honig wrote:
>One can envision a system where there's a corporate "document czar" who
>is regularly given docs from various employees and who then encrypts them
>in his own key. When and where the docs get decrypted is determined by
>corporate pol
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:20:31PM -0500, Eric Murray wrote:
> One can envision a system where there's a corporate "document czar" who
> is regularly given docs from various employees and who then encrypts them
> in his own key. When and where the docs get decrypted is determined by
> corporate p
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 05:14:49PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> * I suggested that Freedom had been somewhat less than successful in the
> marketplace. (Out of 3,500 cypherpunks messages I have stored here, only
> one nym appears, and this is presumably one of the target audiences.) I
> su
At 1:06 PM -0500 10/31/00, Adam Shostack wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 09:11:23AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
>| >>Zero-Knowledge is committed to deploying systems that are
>| >>transparent and accountable. In keeping with this policy,
>| >>MPS will incorporate third party verification and split
>| >>
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
|
| I can't help but feel that this is a weakening of ZK's position
| regarding privacy. The critical paragraph is:
|
| > >Zero-Knowledge is committed to deploying systems that are
| > >transparent and accountable. In keeping with this
