Jim Choate wrote:
Yep,
http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.98.10.12-98.10.18/msg00019.html
has a rant about Rosa Luxemburg and various people redefining the word
"socialism" so that it included only ideas they didn't like excluded
ones they did. It was a sort of reply to a
petro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That was precisely my point: socialism doesn't necessarily mean centralised
statism, wage controls or limited speech. Its roots are in democratic
Socialism *always* means that the same people in a society who
control the use of force also have control
At 02:23 PM 9/22/00 +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
The trouble with that use of the words (though it is the most common one
on this list I guess) is that it defines just about every nation-state
that ever existed as "fascist" including the so-called capitalist
countries: "if you don't manage it the
At 22:24 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
At 1:03 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
At 13:47 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear to be
a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
You keep sending to it yourself. Mind explaining what
At 02:21 09/20/2000 -0400, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
You should read up on Type 1 and Type 2 remailers. Both involve
encryption. In the case of Type 2 remailers, you only need to trust
one in the chain that you use in order to be sure that your identity
is securely hidden.
I do understand how
At 9:36 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
I do understand how both types work, however, the opportunity for
subterfuge is always present. I was making a point that the assumed
security of a remailer should not factor in if you intend to put
yourself at risk. Assumptions are dangerous all
At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses cannot send
messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
I suppose you know why we don´t have that (the remailing issue). But I
kinda have another idea. Just start every subject line with
At 10:54 09/19/2000 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses cannot send
messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
I suppose you know why we don´t have that (the remailing issue). But I
kinda
Asymmetric whined:
Last I checked the remailers allowed return mail to be sent through them,
to the owner of the anonymous account.. isn't that the point? It's easy
enough to forge the email header that I can't believe they exist just to
totally isolate anyone from the responses.. how
At 10:24 09/19/2000 -0500, Anonymous Coward vomited:
Hey, Retardo -- when did you ever check? If you had, you'd know
that you can't reply to anon remailers. Try replying to this, you clueless
shit. Now shut the fuck up about this bullshit, we're all tired of the
subject, and if you can't
At 12:43 -0400 9/19/00, Asymmetric wrote:
Actually asshole, there are plenty of anonymous remailers that DO
let you reply to the originator. In case you're just a bit wet
behind the ears yet and hadn't heard, a while back there was a big
problem with one of them when the government ordered
(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear to
be a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
At 8:04 AM -0400 9/19/00, Asymmetric wrote:
At 10:54 09/19/2000 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
That the list be changed so that unregistered
At 10:54 AM +0200 9/19/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 17:08 2000-09-18 -0400, you wrote:
That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses
cannot send messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
I suppose you know why we don´t have that (the remailing issue). But
I kinda
essage-Id: a04310104b5ed7e0750e3@[207.111.242.243]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 13:36:52 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey kettle, this is the pot. Did you happen to notice you're black?
Fro
000 13:36:52 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey kettle, this is the pot. Did you happen to notice you're black?
From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: -C-P- Re: would it be so much to ask..
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you notice the _real_ list I copied? Check the
At 1:03 AM -0400 9/20/00, Asymmetric wrote:
At 13:47 09/19/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
(P.S. Lose the toad.com address. Get a clue. Or, since you appear
to be a luser, "loose the toad.com address.")
You keep sending to it yourself. Mind explaining what the problem is?
And how many
At 12:43 PM -0400 9/19/00, Asymmetric wrote:
At 10:24 09/19/2000 -0500, Anonymous Coward vomited:
Hey, Retardo -- when did you ever check? If you had, you'd know
that you can't reply to anon remailers. Try replying to this, you clueless
shit. Now shut the fuck up about this bullshit,
Um, if there's any hint of a trail back to the sender where's the
anonymity?
Trust the recipient to use a remailer chain for the return path. or not.
Include the return mail address in the body if you choose to. Isn't that
what anonymity is about? Placing the choice for the disclosure of
At 08:04 2000-09-19 -0400, you wrote:
I can't see the -C-P- subject as really being functional for sorting out
spam mail because anyone new to the list won't know to put them in, nor
the people I mentioned who might wish to make anonymous announcements.
The "-C-P-" think should of course be
That the list be changed so that unregistered email addresses cannot send
messages to it? This spam is getting ridiculous.
---signature file---
PGP Key Fingerprint:
446B 7718 B219 9F1E 43DD 8E4A 6BE9 D739 CCC5 7FD7
"I don't think [Linux] will be very successful in the long run."
"My
20 matches
Mail list logo
