At 5:29 PM -0500 8/19/00, Adam Back wrote:
Anyway, the way I found out about the bug, was by sending someone who
checks signatures (thanks Ben Laurie) a signed message. I'm not sure
how many other signatures I've signed with some misc. test keys by
accident, and the recipients have simply not
- Original Message -
From: Jamie McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Whitehouse Porn Collection
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Declan
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't the fact that the interns surf the net for porn that I disputed.
What I find unlikely is that someone would have gone to a reporter
with a story whose source could easily be traced and would be
professional suicide.
Nice try to only pin it
Ian Brown writes:
... subscribers to agree not to use the service as a means to create a VPN.
Russ Nelson replied:
Could someone describe to me (in my ignorance) the problem this rule is intended to
solve?
Jay Dyson replied:
The whole prohibition with respect to VPN is to coerce @home
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Tim May wrote:
I've seen ragheads^H^H^H^H^H Muslim chicks in front of me at the ATM
wearing their Mohammed-decreed chadoors. No sirens, no cops arriving,
but their money apparently arrives in a timely fashion.
Interesting. That makes it a religious freedom issue, as
