THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
___
For Immediate Release October 27,
2000
STATEMENT BY
Would anyone in the Oregon area know about
a CIA organization acronymed ISTAC?
Here's the NIC entry, which includes a CIA rep
in Bend, OR. Note that the other CIA rep used
only a last name initial.
Designated Agency Rep, Requester, Sr. Registration
Official:
Anonymous writes that there is a CIA facility in Bend,
Oregon, called CPIC/West, balancing one in Miami
called CPIC/Miami. FAS offers a description of Miami
which references Bend:
http://www.fas.org/irp/facility/cia_miami.htm
And to possibly flesh out the operations run out of
the Bend
Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. Rather a
bounce message was returned from bendnet.com,
and surely cloaks delivery of the message.
And the cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] would not even leave this
mailer. So it seemed. But the window glass shivered.
Spookery is awesome.
At 4:37 PM -0400 10/26/00, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 11:59 AM -0700 on 10/26/00, Ray Dillinger wrote:
Here is what I envision, at a cost of something like $10/month.
Go find the original archived web page for c2.net?
When privacy costs more than no privacy, we have no privacy.
Sad, but
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Tim May wrote:
For another, most people have not themelves experience a security
problem. While they understand how neighborhood thieves can break in
and steal their stuff, they have no similar experience for their
computer data. Unless and until this changes, they just
#From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yo, Ding Dong, no need to send it to me twice.
#I think I have a very good idea who you are.
I should hope so, since I'm not anonymous.
Ask Declan or Gilmore if you get stuck.
#The cool thing is that
Igor Chudov wrote:
yep, numerous times. the funny thing is that the "AI" program that is
georgewbush has no state at all, it just replies to the user's last
phrase according to the rules. But I tried to make sure that georgewbush
is well prepared politically.
My experience with splotchy
--
At 06:01 PM 10/27/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
Needless to say, any single person's vote is hardly worth spending 4
minutes evaluating the issues.
Do you believe that the average person spends four minutes evaluating the
issues?
--digsig
James A. Donald
--
At 10:38 PM 10/27/2000 -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
So, to put it another way, when privacy is *cheaper*, on a risk
adjusted basis, than we'll have privacy, and not much until then.
Transactions on the internet need reputational enforcement.
Most of us cannot afford the cost and
--
At 11:30 PM 10/27/2000 +0300, Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
in most modern countries the electorial process is practically
guaranteed - and in fact mostly designed - to in essence round out
dissent.
It is an inherent problem with any democratic system, that it must be
designed to produce
*AMAZING MELT AWAY FAT ABSORBER CAPSULES*
LOSE 30 POUNDS IN 30 DAYS... GUARANTEED!!!
All Natural Weight-Loss Program, Speeds Up The Metabolism Safely
Rated #1 In Both Categories of SAFETY EFFECTIVENESS In
(THE USA TODAY)
WE'LL HELP YOU GET THINNER IN WINTER!!!
WE'RE GOING TO HELP YOU
Dear cypherpunks!
If You are interested in Learning and Starting Home Work!
If You want Own Internet Home Business!
If You need know about REAL MONEY from Internet!
If You need Traffic, Advertising and Promotion Tools!
If would Online shoping and Medicine!
At last - Relax!
Just go to any of
To whom it may concern
We would like some more information on your subject, as it makes no sence to us as we
thought that when you do envelope stuffing you supply all product and knowledge.
That was the nice thing about Ross Perot.
If he'd gotten elected, he'd have caused serious chaos in Washington
(even though he was basically just another Republicrat),
and the worst case is the Second Amendment said we could shoot him
if he got too crazy.
Unfortunately, he wouldn't let go of the
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
Mostly, when I tossed that one off, I was remembering arguments around here
-- more than once -- that anonymity, particularly in anonymous
transactions, will *always* cost more than non-anonymous ones. Something I
dispute rather heatedly, of course,
16 matches
Mail list logo
