Re: Fractal geodesic networks

2000-12-10 Thread Sampo A Syreeni
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Carol A Braddock wrote: So say you -could- estimate a fractal dimension for the internet. What would the number be good for? If it could be shown that a consistent estimate exists and it was calculated, it would probably affect the scaling properties of the Net - after all,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Fractal geodesic networks

2000-12-08 Thread Tim May
At 3:57 PM -0800 12/8/00, Ray Dillinger wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Jim Choate wrote: Fractal simply means non-integer dimension. Yeah, that's where it started. But I'm using it more in the sense of meaning the properties that fractal structures have; self-similarity across scales, for one,

Re: Re: Fractal geodesic networks

2000-12-08 Thread R. A. Hettinga
At 5:49 PM -0800 on 12/8/00, Bill Stewart wrote: At 02:47 PM 12/8/00 -0600, Jim Choate emetted: 'fractal geodesic network' is spin doctor bullshit. Well, buzzword bingo output anyway. :-). "Neological" is so much more... euphemisitic... And the Internet is most certainly NOT(!) geodesic

Re: Fractal geodesic networks

2000-12-08 Thread Carol A Braddock
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:33 PM Subject: Re: Fractal geodesic networks On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Bill Stewart wrote: more like a geodesic dome filled with boiled spaghetti... If you think about it this is actually one way to view the Internet. Consider the highest l