On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

>Mostly, when I tossed that one off, I was remembering arguments around here
>-- more than once -- that anonymity, particularly in anonymous
>transactions, will *always* cost more than non-anonymous ones. Something I
>dispute rather heatedly, of course, or I wouldn't be spending so much
>money, or working so hard, these days to prove otherwise...

I've been thinking pretty much the same thing lately.  When you 
do business with someone, you want to know his/her True Name, so 
that if they 'defect' (ie, take your money on a long trip to the 
bahamas without delivering the goods, or take your goods on a long 
trip to the bahamas without giving you the promised money) you can 
drag their asses into court and get what they promised you. 

Clearly, there is no such recourse when dealing with a Nym.  And 
the hellish thing about Nyms is, they don't cost anything.  If the 
guy (or gal) steals from you using a Nym, you can spread the word 
about that nym and trash its reputation.  But they don't have to 
care, because by this time they'll be using another nym.  With 
Nyms, somebody who has ripped off a hundred people for a million 
dollars each is indistinguishable from someone who's just new to 
the system. While Nyms have zero cost, they will never simultaneously 
be in use and have negative reputation.

It is also very hard to get a positive reputation with a nym; 
(switching to didactic mode). 

Either you are doing a legal business or an illegal business.
   If you are doing a Legal business:
   A customer can go to either a nym or a true name. 
       If a customer goes to a nym, there is no legal recourse, 
       but if a customer goes to a true name, there is legal recourse. 
       Therefore it is clearly better for the customer to go to a true 
       name.
   
   If you are doing an illegal business:
   You either do, or do not, create a "reference" as a result 
   of the transaction. 

      If no reference is created, no reputation can be gained. QED.
 
      If a reference is created, then it either does, or does not, 
      identify the principals and the deal consummated. 

            If the reference identifies the principals and the deal  
            then it can also be used as conclusive proof in court
            against them if the owner of either nym is ever discovered. 
            And this is the best kind of "digital reputation" I can 
            find in this system.  It will be significant to someone 
            else who has dealt with one of the principals as an 
            introduction to the other, but cannot really be useful 
            beyond that. 

        If the reference does not identify the principals and the 
        deal consummated, then either it does not identify the principals 
        or it does not identify the deal consummated. 

            If the reference does not identify the principals in the 
            deal, then it can be duplicated at will by anyone who 
            creates a few Nyms and puts them through the paces of a 
            few pretended deals, and is therefore meaningless. 

            If the reference does not identify the deal consummated, 
            then it becomes impossible to make judgements based upon 
            it. -- a cocaine dealer with a million-dollar shipment is 
            hardly going to accept a "reference" which might be based 
            on the purchase or sale of a pocketknife.  Such references 
            are also meaningless.

                                Bear

Reply via email to