New--Faster and Easier than Ever

2000-05-24 Thread Driveway.com
Title: Driveway




 
   

   

   

Member 
  Name
  
  
  
   
Password
  
   
  Forgot Password?
 
  

  
   

  

  
  
  
  Your 
Smart Drive on the Web 

  


  

   

  
   

 
  Announcing The New DrivewayYour 
  Smart Drive on the Web 
  Dear Louis,
Member Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  It's here! The new, updated version of Driveway is now ready for you 
to use. And you're going to love all the new features and benefits. 
  What's Changed?
The new version of Driveway is faster, easier-to-use, and smarter than 
ever before - with an improved look and feel. 
  What Hasn't Changed?
All the great features you've used before. And you can rest assured that 
our updated service will not change any of your existing files. 
  Log On to Driveway and check out our exciting 
features. 
  

   

  
   
 
  Member Name
   
  
  
Password
  
  
 
  

Forgot 
  your
  Password?
  
   

  

  
  What's new?
We're faster, easier and smarter than ever before! 
  Faster
 Clip and save Web pages from your favorite sites directly to Driveway.
 Save files from Partner sites directly to Driveway.
 Drag and drop files from your desktop directly to Driveway. 
  Easier
 Get a quick overview of recent Driveway activity with one easy 
look.
 Find files easily with our new, advanced search feature.
 Reusable guest lists make sharing even simpler. 
  Smarter
 Control who has read only or read/write 
access to shared files.
 Track who has accessed your files - and when.
 Organize your files into categories; you can even share those categories. 
  Try Driveway now and see the changes for yourself 
at:
www.driveway.com. 
   
  Chris 
Logan, CEO
Driveway Corporation 



  Look who's talking
  about Driveway
   
  
"Microsoft users can save files directly onto Driveway's remote server 
the same way they are able to save to a floppy disk or hard drive." 
  
"Driveway can put files at your fingertips anywhere you have Internet 
access." 
  
"Use Driveway to store all the word processing documents, photos, MP3s 
and such you want for recall whenever and wherever you find a Web browser." 
  
"If your need is for storage checkout Driveway." 
   
  
  
   
 
  
   
  Win a Free Palm V in ePilot.com's Weekly Drawings! 
  A $390 Value! 
  Click 
  Here to Register Now! 
  
  
 
  2000 Driveway Corporation. All rights reserved. Driveway(sm) is 
a service mark of Driveway Corporation.Your email address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  






Patent Office bad decision on cell-phone location services.

2000-05-24 Thread Bill Stewart

This was on Dave Farber's list.
If the press release is to be believed, it's a patent on
using a wireless handset to deliver information that's
dependent on where you are, such as telling you the nearest MacDonald's.
- handset-based services granted now, network-based pending.
I'm not sure how broad their patent claims are,
as opposed to their marketing PR (:-), but it sounds like it's
way over-broad, steps on lots of things that should be obvious enough
to anyone skilled in the trade, and sounds like Yet Another
Stupid Patent Office Trick.

..."U.S. patent office has conditionally allowed Cell-Loc to claim the
delivery of handset-based wireless location content and services over
the Internet as its property, regardless of technological method
employed."

http://www.cell-loc.com/mdnews/NR000516.html

Unfortunately, after downloading the half megabyte of animated Web Designer
Candy
that serves as their main web page, it wasn't possible to get to any
real information...




Thanks! 
Bill
Bill Stewart, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639




Re: Patent Office bad decision on cell-phone location services.

2000-05-24 Thread Adam Shostack

I look at this patent as a good thing.  It means that the "Put a GPS
in your cell-phone" just became more expensive.  It means that the
WAP-consortium can't sell your privacy without paying royalties to
cel-loc.   So cheap phones won't have the feature.  Cool.

Adam


On Wed, May 24, 2000 at 01:01:13AM -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
| 
| This was on Dave Farber's list.
| If the press release is to be believed, it's a patent on
| using a wireless handset to deliver information that's
| dependent on where you are, such as telling you the nearest MacDonald's.
| - handset-based services granted now, network-based pending.
| I'm not sure how broad their patent claims are,
| as opposed to their marketing PR (:-), but it sounds like it's
| way over-broad, steps on lots of things that should be obvious enough
| to anyone skilled in the trade, and sounds like Yet Another
| Stupid Patent Office Trick.



-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
   -Hume





Fwd: Gnutella

2000-05-24 Thread Vince



By Ariana Eunjung Cha Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, May 18, 2000;
Page A01 

Two months ago, Justin Frankel created an ingenious little software tool
that allows its users to bypass the dominant Internet companies and
communicate directly among themselves. His bosses at America Online Inc.,
the biggest computing network of them all, were so impressed they tried to
snuff it out of existence. Within 24 hours, AOL officials had removed the
tool, called Gnutella, from the Web site of its Nullsoft development house.
It was, they declared, an "unauthorized freelance project." But they were
too late. About 10,000 people had already downloaded the program onto their
own machines, creating bustling networks for the free exchange of
everything from digital music files and pictures to political propaganda
beyond the control of AOL, its merger partner Time Warner Inc. or anyone
else. Both the beauty and danger of Gnutella are that it is a more
sophisticated version of Napster, the infamous and popular program that
college students have been using to swap music files over the Web.
Napster's developers have recently been hit with a flurry of
copyright-infringement lawsuits. But unlike users of Napster, Gnutella
aficionados can trade files without going through a storage center, making
it impossible to shut down the system without unplugging every computer on
the network and difficult to control by laws because there's no central
authority. Marc Andreessen, a co-founder of Netscape Communications and a
former chief technology officer for AOL, compares Gnutella to a benevolent
virus, a "revolutionary" program that spreads the power of publishing from
an elite set of corporations to anyone who has a computer. "It changes the
Internet in a way that it hasn't changed since the browser," Andreessen
said. At a time when the general assumption is that the World Wide Web's
destiny will be guided by international conglomerates such as AOL,
Amazon.com Inc., Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp., Gnutella is the unexpected
variable. Its very existence is a statement about the wild nature of the
Web and how difficult it will be for anyone to tame it. It is also a
dramatic display of how easily the Internet can be transformed or at least
shaken by smart computer programmers who are barely old enough to drink or
drive. Frankel, 21, and his good friend and software co-creator, Tom
Pepper, another twentysomething Nullsoft employee, have become virtual cult
heroes. Their work is being refined daily by hundreds of young volunteer
programmers around the world who hope to extend Gnutella's reach, making it
a free search engine for the masses. The decentralization of power that
Gnutella represents has revived the romantic dream of many a cyberspace
pioneer--that of a truly free realm where no information gatekeeper exists

and where all property is commonly owned. But those who hope to profit
handsomely from the Internet's transformation into a global
marketplace--record companies, book publishers, movie makers and
practically everyone else with a stake in selling information--regard
Gnutella as a device for thievery. It was, after all, Gerald Levin, chief
executive of Time Warner Inc., which owns the Warner Music label, who
called on his AOL counterpart, Steve Case, to quash the Gnutella project.
Carey Heckman, a professor of law and technology at Stanford University,
said the software could undermine the foundation of many
multibillion-dollar corporations. "It's about how information flows and who
controls that system," Heckman said. "The idea of a handful of institutions
filtering information may be decaying." Origin of a New Species The name
Gnutella comes from a combination of Gnu, the popular suite of free Unix
software, and Nutella, the chocolatey hazelnut spread that Frankel is said
to favor. It is the most advanced of a new generation of what are known as
"distributed network" programs with names like Freenet and iMesh. Freenet,
also a relative of Napster, is the brainchild of Ian Clarke, a 23-year-old
in London. The program, which is still in the early stages of development,
has drawn attention because it deliberately makes it all but impossible to
identify the source of a file. Thus it could act as a megaphone for
political dissidents fearful of retribution, as well as potentially a
gathering place for terrorists, pornographers and other malevolent users.
"People should be free to distribute information without restrictions of
any form," Clarke said in an e-mail. Programs such as Freenet and Gnutella
conform to the original vision of the Internet's architects, who imagined
it to be a completely decentralized system. But then corporations came
along and set up central information storehouses called "servers." Being
able to control storage and distribution of information, of course, gives
online companies the ability to set prices, track the habits of users and
block material they find objectionable. Any computer running 

Re: After Fermat

2000-05-24 Thread dmolnar



On Wed, 24 May 2000, Eric Cordian wrote:

 The Clay Mathematics Institude recently picked the seven such problems it
 considers most important, and put them on its web page, together with both
 a layman's blurb, and a rigorous statement of the problem in .pdf format,
 as the greatest unresolved problems of the 20th century.

 
 P versus NP

For what it's worth, the Clay Math Institute (which seems to be new?)
is sponsoring a summer school in computational complexity theory jointly
with the Park City Math Institute. You can see the details, including 
abstracts of the lectures to be offered at 

http://www.admin.ias.edu/ma/SummerSession2000.htm

I am attending the undergraduate program thanks to CMI's support...

I wonder if they are sponsoring other institutes or work connected to
the other major open problems. 

Thanks, 
-David




Re: CDR: Re: After Fermat

2000-05-24 Thread Eric Cordian

Jim Choate wrotes:

 I've looked around, the only thing I can find is a paper by Y.K. Huen.
 However, it requires a change in some definitions.

The abstract I remember reading proved GC on a set of finite number fields
of increasing size, and then inferred it for the integers at the end.

The "proof" doesn't seem to have become famous, and yet, I don't recall it
being publicly shot down either.  Then some other group announced a big
prize for proving GC recently, so I really have no clue as to what is
going on.

The distribution of prime numbers is completely determined once one
classifies the zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function, so perhaps the Clay
Math folks considered the inclusion of two problems on the structure of
prime numbers redundant, and the Riemann Hypothesis to be the most
important one.

The Riemann Hypothesis, and NP=P, are of course the only problems in the
seven with earthshaking implications for the face of Crypto As We Know It.

-- 
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"




Re: CDR: Re: CDR: Re: After Fermat

2000-05-24 Thread Eric Cordian

Jim Choate wrote:

 The abstract I remember reading proved GC on a set of finite number
 fields of increasing size, and then inferred it for the integers at the
 end.

 That wouldn't be sufficiently robust. Simply because the first n primes do
 it is not sufficient to prove that all primes will do it.

I believe the idea was that given an integer, there was a number field of
sufficient size in the family such that the decomposition w.r.t. the
number field was the same as that in Z.

Of course, it's hard to tell from reading an abstract whether something is
going to sink or swim. 

This apparently sank, although as I remember it provoked lots of
discussion in sci.math and here on the list at the time.

 I've been working on GC for several years now and I haven't come across
 anything in this regards. There is a page of recent progress on GC (don't
 know how often it's updated),

The Generalized Riemann Hypothesis implies a weaker version of Goldbach's
conjecture involving three primes instead of two.  That seems to be the
strongest thing they've proved so far.

-- 
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"




Username/Password info

2000-05-24 Thread otn

Thank you for requesting your account information.

Please use the following Username and Password to access http://www.oracle.com or 
http://technet.oracle.com.

Username: jcpunk
Password: jcpunk