RE: ZKS makes the WSJ (again)

While we're fantasizing, let's imagine that it uses some kind of crypto credential system to prevent abuse. Is this feasible? What do you mean by "abuse"?

RE: ZKS makes the WSJ (again)

Tim May writes: The fact that some fine people work for ZKS should cause us to give them a pass on such important issues. Of course he meant the opposite (no doubt a correction will have appeared in the many hours it takes for remailed messages to appear). The shameful silence of cypherpunks