Re: Mail, please.

2016-09-13 Thread John Newman
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:59:04PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:38:24PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Liam E. wrote: > > > What is the most minimal setup for command-line mail on a system like > > > Debian? > > > >

Re: Mail, please.

2016-09-12 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > per email > downloading, without any pipelining Think about that for a while. > but technically > optional. As before, the whole paragraph was optional for simple use[r]s. > I still find mbox "folders" substantially

Re: Mail, please.

2016-09-12 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:38:24PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Liam E. wrote: > > What is the most minimal setup for command-line mail on a system like > > Debian? > > On any BSD or Linux, neomutt with mbox [1] serves simple use[r]s. > You can

Re: Mail, please.

2016-09-12 Thread Stephen D. Williams
On 9/12/16 4:54 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:29:09PM -, Liam E. wrote: >> What is the most minimal setup for command-line mail on a system like Debian? > "MUA and POP retriever." > > For ultra lightweight, use bsd-mailx > > For features, use alpine or mutt > > For

Re: Mail, please.

2016-09-12 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:29:09PM -, Liam E. wrote: > What is the most minimal setup for command-line mail on a system like Debian? "MUA and POP retriever." For ultra lightweight, use bsd-mailx For features, use alpine or mutt For retriever, getmail or mpop. Fetchmail is way too slow.