If you want me to thread like Semich then I suggest you both go fuck yourselves.
Network Ignorance coming from the same Ignoramus who can't figure out
how to properly thread his email replies. Here's a protip...
HIT THE MOTHERFUCKING REPLY BUTTON YOU ASSHOLE !!!
Gallup foced to admit Repubs will win 2024...
Social Conservatism In U.S. Highest In A Decade: Gallup
By Jeffrey Jones of Gallup
More Americans this year (38%) say they are very conservative or
conservative on social issues than said so in 2022 (33%) and 2021
(30%). At the same time, the
>>> . . . the requirement is 50GB per day, *per link*.
Imagine you are a TOR entry node. If you are serving 1,000 people -
which is not a whole lot - you need to serve 50 TB of dummy traffic per day.
For free.
Big ouch.
Plus you need links to intermediate nodes - to do this properly you
Full title: Anti-LGBTQ+ Neo-Nazi Chased out of Anarchist Bookstore in
Philadelphia Has History of Exposing Himself to “Teenage Girls”
https://anarchistnews.org/content/anti-lgbtq-neo-nazi-chased-out-anarchist-bookstore
Reposts not yet more bilge from Bloomberg & escape to New York
For more on these ways to break free of serfdom, check out my books
Resistance, Revolution, Liberation: A Model for Positive Change, An
Unconventional Guide to Investing in Troubled Times and Self-Reliance
in the 21st Century.
Here is Neofeudal Financial Serfdom in three charts: just because
Corrupt Biden-Clinton Crime Family...
Key Player In Biden Documents Removal Was Caught Up In Bill
Clinton-Era Chinagate Scandal
Authored by Paul Sperry via RealClear Wire,
The custodian of Joe Biden’s vice presidential records, a key witness
in his classified documents probe, was caught up in
Gag you with soccom biggov overlords...
Fight Back Against The Global HOMOGENIZATION Regime...
Before they throw *you* in the blender and render you down into goo,
literally...
“The UnCommunist Manifesto” outlined the utopian communist dream as
the grand homogenization of man:
If only
Russiagate: The Scandal That Became Business As Usual
https://www.realclearwire.com/articles/2023/06/08/russiagate_the_scandal_that_became_business_as_usual_149331.html
Special Counsel John Durham may have issued his final report last
month, but the Russiagate scandal is far from over. This is
Democrats (aka: SocComLeftists, now the lot of them) are
100% responsible for this downfall, and David Barrett voted
for them, what a shame...
California Advances Bill To Help Shoplifters Steal
When Queer Child Groomers issue death threats you know
they have serious mental and idealogical problems,
not about the 100% equal civil rights they already have.
No wonder the Americans are now rightly fighting back
against their manufactured Leftist bullshit and creepy
evil grooming and
On the senile cypherpunks planet piss is lemonade and shit is chocolate. Also
wise Guys never took out contracts on anybody and online assassination markets
were never even dreamed of.
" . .
Cypherpunks like Wei Dai, Tim May, myself were interested in smart contracts,
anonymous or
The current spec of NIP-04 messaging protocol are signed by the
sender/publisher, the protocol itself is undeniable. In order to implement
deniable instant messaging based on Nostr, users can generate a new ephemeral
key pair as a "temporary identity" specifically for instant messaging, even
Blockchains proffer huge energy savings already - and now . .
Quantum miners would yield ‘massive’ energy savings for blockchains!
https://cointelegraph.com/news/quantum-miners-would-yield-massive-energy-savings-for-blockchain-study
Reposts not list cluttering cacophony from conformist dipshits
Btc is useless and dangerous he reportedly said recently.
I suspect he meant it's useless in the Serbian kingdom and dangerous in El
Slavador.
Yr mileage etc
——
if we were to resist mcboss, basically it’s easiest to operate within
mcboss’s constraints
for example, it seems at least irritating for both me and him, to
delete something i’ve uploaded to arweave (i guess? for now?).
hopefully this becomes even stronger.
meanwhile, there are areas where
i found a way to make money: somebody made a machine that enforces an
arithmetic of 1+2=4. i put two dollars in one side, and a third in
other, and take four dollars out the front.
i took off the side and found a little robot that is scanning the
bills and printing more.
—
but in reality it puts
one approach to still building a rationality could be to find
experiences that are reasonable surrogates for dissociated reasons
for example, the development of new political cults in my country, if
i got myself harrassed overtly by one, maybe this would be much easier
to conceive of
or how
i infer we want to argue positive logic with demonstration and
provision, so a machine that successfully navigates confusion or
performs an all-possible logic could be helpful
i’m guessing i avoid considering impossibility and universal
constraints because i experience a need to deenergize a part of me
that urgently acts on false constraints and false impossibilities
On 6/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
wrote:
> maybe what the arithmetic-borg demonstrates is that the laws we find
> applying to portions of the world can be shown to relate to real laws
> that define our reality, and this helps make them more useful
didn’t mean
maybe what the arithmetic-borg demonstrates is that the laws we find
applying to portions of the world can be shown to relate to real laws
that define our reality, and this helps make them more useful
it seems intuitive that finding a law that mostly describes something
would mean it relates to
thinking of an extreme where all particles in the universe are
carefully in some way added to a sum
then further antiparticles made so as to make more particles and
continue increasing the sum
to make it work you might need an intelligent agent that can enforce
arithmetic, preventing the particles
On 6/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
wrote:
> if we consider a=1, b=2, a+b equals 3 or 4
> these things represent concepts in the real world
> if we transfer arithmetic to the real world, the constraints aren’t
> within the rules of the system anymore, they’re
maybe a core not-that-clearly-logic part here is conflict.
i view conflict as often stemming from different views, beliefs, or
_experiences_ — focuses on different portions of the world, where
different rules apply
when that happens, maybe it’s kind of like a forthright delusion.
we’re using the
so what’s the difference between the arithmeticion who refuses to
count, and the logical mistake in a forthright argument? any clear
logical differences?
this … space of e.g. dissociated, conflicting, delusional, confused,
or misleading/misled behavior, has a situation of engaging portions of
the world that are not relevant.
if i start referring to subatomic particle interactions when debating
arithmetic, you can be sure i’m avoiding something,
> patterns that fully describe these patterns (because it is so useful
*fully describe those portions
…
so, when we communicate about logic, there’s an unspoken assumption
that what matters to us, what we’re trying to talk about, is the
portion of the world where the used rules of logic are
maybe we look at portions of the world and observe that we can write
patterns that fully describe these patterns (because it is so useful
to do so). often this means adjusting the portions or the patterns a
little as we learn more.
then, when we engage those rules or patterns, we are tacitly
if we consider a=1, b=2, a+b equals 3 or 4
these things represent concepts in the real world
if we transfer arithmetic to the real world, the constraints aren’t
within the rules of the system anymore, they’re within the systems and
behaviors of counted items
for example, combining two items with
# well, when does 1+2=4?
# answer: in _different arithmetic systems_. so the constraints were
indeed within the logic.
a=1
b=2
prove that a+b=3
disprove that a+b=4
# in a proof situation, we are temporarily writing as if the axioms
are always true.
# there are additionally hidden axioms which are the rules used for the proof.
# hence, our conclusion is true only under the conditions that all of the axioms
# and
somewhat scared of constraint enumeration. want to use constraints for
making possibility and wellness, not making impossibility and harm.
nice to think of there being a clear logical system though.
On 6/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
wrote:
> anyway, things are
plane full of pigs lands at mcbosscorp
the pigs get out, chat with workers, bring workers on their plane,
take them joyriding
one pig sees the nanite powersuit department, dons one, and tells it
to sprout large wings, and begins flying around in its own. other
employees follow suit.
the winged
new regulation from the TSA.
pigs are not allowed on planes. no-fly for all pigs.
we’re very worried about breaking the laws of time and space ascribed
by the common phrase “when pigs fly”. this is actually a situation of
significant impact for the government.
anyway, things are impossible if and only if there are constraints
around them from which a contradiction emerges
generally, things without sufficient constraints are never impossible,
and that is why you can easily make a pig fly by taking it on an
airplane.
but in rational decisions, we
maybe this general fear of experiencing various forms of harm could be
cast as a biggest reason to believe irrational things
hard to hold that adjacent to building basic logic, considering normal
contradictory inference because lacking logic skill around, could make
sense to separate concepts,
part of the spread might be a fear that i’ll be harmed more if more
parts of my consciousness profile as believing X can be resisted
relates to my complex coping strategy mentioned in other thread. barf.
maybe spreads extra from the time i went on tor and talked with people
outside my bubble
it also looks at things like bitcoin that historically broke economic
class boundaries
then the feeling-contradictions that arise from this seem kind of like
little traumatic delusions. builds idea that
there’s something irrational wound into part of my sense of
possibility that quickly judges things as impossible when they aren’t,
maybe spread from “hyonotic slavery” like “it’s impossible to resist
X” where X is roughly some unnamed mcboss cabal
i think the rule of thumb is that things can be impossible only when
there are sufficient constraints on them that a contradiction develops
from the constraints
and that this is normal and is a basic part of how normal rational
decisions are made
anyway considering what happens or does not happen is an important
area of rationality
for example there are proofs by counterexample or contradiction
in rebuilding beliefs that things are possible at all (huge messaging
that things are impossible, so sad to learn of so many people being
severely
the set of what is possible and what is impossible is a little hard for me
i generally hold the value that everything is possible[ not sure
why question here
some thought on the danger of personalized media that build poor
choices via compromised devices. there could be a lot of value to not
engaging compromised devices and systems.
this might mean really keying on indicators of compromise, and
becoming skilled at asserting the importance of
> there’s a nasty set of influences that encourage poor choices, what’s
> notable there is that poor choices resonate, producing worse
> situations and worse choices
because of the severe impact of this one it seems useful to keep it
somewhat nearby and try to figure ways of making better
it’s notable that the personality of all this, because of how things
build among each other, could be very different depending on the
personalities of the people and parts impacted
for example i have a complex personal coping strategy internally,
that’s significantly impacted my experience from
On 6/9/23, Undescribed Horrific Abuse, One Victim & Survivor of Many
wrote:
>> Further thoughts include why the change in behavior developed, as well
>> as what other behaviors and situations facilitated that, and how to
>> include those complexities in addressing it.
>
> I’m thinking there are
there’s a nasty set of influences that encourage poor choices, what’s
notable there is that poor choices resonate, producing worse
situations and worse choices
> Further thoughts include why the change in behavior developed, as well
> as what other behaviors and situations facilitated that, and how to
> include those complexities in addressing it.
I’m thinking there are maybe big categories here:
- sensitized terror, triggers and experiences rooted in
honestly for me it seems quite grounding to be exposed to rational
concepts around difficult things, it’s just very hard to do so myself
Thinking also of possible importance of building rationality around
triggering concepts in some way, such that dissociative habits learn
general logic rather than context, and where it is appropriate, more
needed, or safe, to engage this; how aggressively or how carefully.
> - when irrational, this seems to worsen as the pressure continues
> - if there is something in one that reduces rationality, and it has
> reason, this seems analogous to dissociation or trauma. conflict with
> basic reason implies an unhandleable truth.
Another thought here is that a system
- it’s helpful, pleasant, and grounding to relate with rational people
and conversations
- it’s quite hard, and there is a great urge to pressure them to be irrational
- when irrational, this seems to worsen as the pressure continues
- if there is something in one that reduces rationality, and it
>> Up to a point, yes. In most cases that point is 25GB/month, after which
>> your traffic gets throttled. Unmetered lower bandwidth contracts also
>> exist, but don't help enough.
>>
>>
>> However, you miss my point - the requirement is 50GB per day, *per link*.
>>
>> Imagine you are a TOR entry
54 matches
Mail list logo
