- Forwarded message from Rich Kulawiec -
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:12:08 -0500
From: Rich Kulawiec
To: liberationtech
Subject: Re: [liberationtech] Facebook: Building Global Community - What's your
response to Mark
- Forwarded message from Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
-
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:14:09 -0500
From: Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
To: cryptogra...@metzdowd.com, bitcoin-...@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 02:02:50PM -0300, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017, at 5:51 AM, oshwm <os...@openmailbox.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 22 February 2017 08:34:43 GMT+00:00, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote:
> >
> > >Who is the list owner the
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:03:03AM -0500, Steve Kinney wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> On 02/22/2017 03:51 AM, oshwm wrote:
> > On 22 February 2017 08:34:43 GMT+00:00, Eugen Leitl
> > <eu...@leitl.org> wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:34AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> In addition to not putting retarded spaces in links
> which does nothing useful, you can also learn to
> preserve threading on replies, which is actually useful.
> Top posting, bulk quoting, html, shortlink svcs... all bad.
> wtfppl.
Who
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:31:42PM -0300, juan wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:50:18 +
> Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:50:26PM -0300, juan wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "INDUSTRIAL SOC
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:50:26PM -0300, juan wrote:
>
>
>
> "INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE" - Ted Kaczynski
>
> says lots of stupid things but makes some good points too
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm
>
He
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:50:49AM +, oshwm wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> If you are already part of functional censored lists why would you be
> interested in this despicable, dysfunctional, uncensored list?
That's because it has been a very useful list for
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:09:45AM +, oshwm wrote:
> I believe you are looking for the cryptography list or tor list if you want
> to only see what a particular individual thinks is acceptable :D
I'm subscribed to those, and they are actually functional, unlike this list.
I vastly prefer a
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:58:09PM -0600, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I decided to subscribe to take a peek recently, and wanted to ask if
> this mailing list has bona fide discussions of cryptography, its role
> in the modern economy, finance and politics, etc.
That was a long time ago, in a galaxy
You might have seen the Tor phone project
http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/11/tor-phone-prototype-google-hostility-android-open-source/
http://arstechnica.co.uk/security/2016/11/tor-phone-prototype-google-hostility-android-open-source/
which is based on CopperheadOS
11 matches
Mail list logo