On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
>> > beginning of this thread was a proposal that the problem is that
>> > the
>> > government might target an activist group's finances. Now it
>> > sounds
>> > like you are talking about the government trying to attack the
>> > entire
>>
Original message From: Greg Newby Date:
8/15/18 8:56 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Cypherpunks Subject:
Censorship on cypherpunks ? Re: [Cryptography] Krugman blockchain
currency skepticism
> Is what's below complaining about the cypherpunks list? I'm the "m
Is what's below complaining about the cypherpunks list? I'm the "moderator"
but never moderate anything. When mailman's auto-defenses is triggered, I need
to go in and twiddle it to allow the message.
For message below, mailman held the message because cypherpu...@cpunks.org was
bcc'd among
[Resending four replies in one to participants bcc uncensored cypherpunks,
as censorship on an already moderator approved, thus explicitly
moderator solicited,
variety thread where moderator already censored the queue twice
resent, and moderator
approved questions by posters in thread were left
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> OK, I can't resist any longer. Let's look at some payment and store of value
> systems:
Ok...
> Gold metal:
> Terrible for electronic payment.
Transferring electronic stock in GLD, or other forms of gold securities,
works fine, is slow and
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 14:11 +0800, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> As others have asked, what is the problem we want to solve? The
> beginning of this thread was a proposal that the problem is that the
> government might target an activist
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> OK, I can't resist any longer. Let's look at some payment and store of value
> systems:
Ok...
> Gold metal:
> Terrible for electronic payment.
Transferring electronic stock in GLD, or other forms of gold securities,
works fine, is slow and
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 14:11 +0800, jam...@echeque.com wrote:
> As others have asked, what is the problem we want to solve? The
> beginning of this thread was a proposal that the problem is that the
> government might target an activist
Again, your ideas and lists?
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 01:08:44 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> > is metzger himself the little king by divine right of the
> > 'cryptography' mailing list?
>
> And your ideas as to the validity and value of well curated strictly
> on topic lists / charters?
what - are you retarded or
> is metzger himself the little king by divine right of the
> 'cryptography' mailing list?
And your ideas as to the validity and value of well curated strictly
on topic lists / charters?
Particularly when... unless of course already in a censored
environment / network regime,
say China
> makes it easier for perpetrators of ransomware to get paid without getting
> caught. ;-)
> expecting an answer that had a positive societal benefit, were you? Because I
> can't think of one.
Spending infracoin, onboarding outside the box into
infosec, accomplishing general education...
(of
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 17:33:03 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:05 AM, William Allen Simpson
> wrote:
> > Krugman has a column today that's saying some things that have already
> > been posted here. Hopefully will gain traction.
> >
> >
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:05 AM, William Allen Simpson
wrote:
> Krugman has a column today that's saying some things that have already
> been posted here. Hopefully will gain traction.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/31/opinion/transaction-costs-and-tethers-why-im-a-crypto-skeptic.html
14 matches
Mail list logo
