[Cryptography] jammers, nor not

2017-03-10 Thread Shari
> Ryan Carboni ryacko at gmail.com > Thu Mar 9 14:18:43 PST 2017 > > The academic community for cryptography is strange, > no null results are published Because they r all poser namefaggots.

Re: [Cryptography] jammers, nor not

2017-03-01 Thread Razer
On 03/01/2017 12:22 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > Most problems are a capitalist's marketing opportunity :) Turn the damn thing off first and take the battery out THEN wrap that rascal. Wrapping a phone tightly in foil will drive the SWR of the transmitter off-the-scale and one of two things

Re: [Cryptography] jammers, nor not

2017-03-01 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:39:26PM -0500, grarpamp wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Thornburg > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:21:12PM -0800, Ron Garret wrote: > >> Wrapping your gadgets in aluminum foil should be pretty effective > >> at (ahem)

Re: [Cryptography] jammers, nor not

2017-02-28 Thread Mirimir
On 02/28/2017 11:39 AM, grarpamp wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Thornburg > wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:21:12PM -0800, Ron Garret wrote: >>> Wrapping your gadgets in aluminum foil should be pretty effective >>> at (ahem) foiling their attempts

Re: [Cryptography] jammers, nor not

2017-02-28 Thread grarpamp
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:21:12PM -0800, Ron Garret wrote: >> Wrapping your gadgets in aluminum foil should be pretty effective >> at (ahem) foiling their attempts to contact a wifi hub. > > Unless your entire